期刊文献+

WTO《SPS协议》下植物检疫措施标准执行判定误区的探讨 被引量:1

Misunderstanding in Application and Judgment of Standards of Plant Quarantine Measures under SPS Agreement of WTO
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际植物保护组织(IPPC)秘书处是植物保护领域国际合作的多边协议组织和协调工具,同时也是WTO《SPS协议》下唯一的植物检疫措施标准制订组织。该组织制定的ISPM第15号出版物中明确指出国际上普遍使用的木质包装检疫处理措施标准,各缔约国均执行该标准。该标准执行已经10年,但在实际执行过程中存在着严重的判定误区,这个不规范的做法可能直接导致检疫处理失败并且有产生疫情传播的风险。研究人员在对数据整理分析过程中对这个意外的发现产生了极大的兴趣,并通过科学的方法提出了解决问题的建议,更希望将这个建议作为国际植物检疫措施标准执行与判定的依据。 The Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) is an organizing and coordinating tool on multi-lateral agreement for international cooperation in the field of plant protection, and also the only organization to formulate standards of plant quarantine measures under the "SPS Agreement"of WTO. The No. 15 publication of ISPM developed by the organization clearly specifies the standards of quarantine treatment measures for wood packaging commonly used worldwide, and all contracting parties apply the standards. The standards have been applied for decades, but there exists in the actual application process serious misunderstanding in judgment, which is not a standardized practice and may directly result in failure of quarantine treatment and risk of spread of epidemic. The unexpected discovery of it in the process of data sorting and analysis aroused great interest for Song Jie and researchers, who put forward suggestions on solution with scientific methods. It is strongly hoped that their proposal will be the basis for application and judgment of the international standards of plant quarantine measures.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 2014年第30期10791-10793,共3页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 中美合作子课题 江苏出入境检验检疫局项目(2009KJ047) 质检总局项目(2012IK277)
关键词 SPS协议 检疫措施 标准 木质包装 SPS agreement Quarantine measures Standards Wood packaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献9

共引文献6

同被引文献36

  • 1段胜男,陈乃中,李志红.植物检疫行业标准制定中的质量风险分析[J].标准科学,2013(3):81-83. 被引量:1
  • 2孙楠,黄冠胜,林伟,李志红.主要贸易国家有害生物风险分析研究方法比较[J].植物检疫,2007,21(2):87-91. 被引量:29
  • 3陈玉兰.植物检疫在国际贸易中的作用和地位[J].国际贸易,2012(1):6-8.
  • 4The IPPC SecretariatInternational Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)[EB/OL].https://www.ippc.int/en/core- activities/standardssetting/ispms/,2015-06-03.
  • 5BeghinJ.C.and Bureau J.C.Quantitative Policy Analysis of Sanitary and Phytosanitary and Technical Barriers to Trade [J].Economie Intemationale,2001(87):286-291.
  • 6国家质检总局.中国技术性贸易措施网[EB/OL].http://www.tbtsps.gov.cn/page/cwtoz/Indexquery.action,2015-12-16.
  • 7United States Department of Agriculture.USDA agencies andoffices [EB/OL].http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome,2015-12-26.
  • 8European Commission.EFSA adheres to a number of principles and practices aimed at ensuring the excellence of our work[EB/OL].http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/aboutefsa,2013-06-23.
  • 9Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Water Resource.Biosecurity in Australia[EB/OL].http://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity,2016-03-03.
  • 10The international plant protection convention secretariat.IPPC.ISPM No.11:Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests.2013[S].FAO:2014.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部