1Vandenberg R ], Lance C E. A Review and Syn-thesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Sug- gestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Orga- nizational Research [J ]. Organizational Research Meth- ods, 2000(3) :4-70.
2Phang C W, Kankanhalli A, SabheBval R. Us- ability and Sociability in Online Cormnunities: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Seeking and Contri- bution [J ] .Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2009 (10) : 721-747.
3Joreskog K G. Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Sev- eral Populations[J]. Psychometrika, 1971 (36):409- 426.
4Taris T W, Bok I A, Meijer Z Y. Assessing Sta- bility and Change of Psychometric Properties of Mul- ti-item Concepts Across Different Situations: A Gen- eral Approach [J ]. Journal of Psychology, 1998 (132) : 301-316.
5Byme B. Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming 2a ed [M].Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2006.
7Bartunek J M, Franzak F J. The Effects of Orga- nizational Restructuring on Frames of Reference and Cooperation [J ] .Journal of Management, 1988 (14) : 579-592.
8Byrne B, Shavelson k, Muth6n M. Testing for the Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Struc- tures: The Issue of Partial Measurement Invariance [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1989( 105 ) : 456-466.
9Steenkamp J E M, Baumgartner H. Assessing Mea- surement Invariance in Cross-national Consumer re- search [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988 (25) : 78-90.
10AIwin D F, Jackson D J. Applications of Simulta-neous Factor Analysis to Issues of Factorial Invariance. In D J Jackson,E F Borgatta (Eds), Factor Analysis and Measurement in Sociological Research [M]. Bev- erly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981:249-279.
二级参考文献32
1[1]Drasgow F. Biased test items and differential validity. Psychological Bulletin,1982, 92: 526～531
2[2]Bobko P, Kehoe J F. On the fair use of bias: a comment on Drasgow. Psychology Bulletin, 1983, 93: 604～608
3[3]Drasgow F. Scrutinizing psychological tests: measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95: 34～135
4[4]Drasgow F. Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. Journal of Applied psychology, 1987, 72: 19～29
5[5]Byrne B M, Shavelson R J, Muthen B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures:the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 1989,105: 456～466
6[6]Drasgow F, Kanfer R. Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70: 662～680
7[7]Idaszak J R, Bottom W P, Drasgow F. A test of the measurement equivalence of the revised job diagnostic survey: past problems and current solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73: 647～656
8[8]Facteau J D, Craig S B. Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 88: 215～227
9[9]Maurer T J, Raju N S, Collins W C. Peer and subordinate performance appraisal measurement equivalence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83: 693～702
10[10]Mullen M R. Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 1995, 26: 573～596
