期刊文献+

国际刑事法院管辖权的矛盾及辩证分析

Contradiction on the Jurisdiction of International Criminal Court
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际刑事法院管辖权作为不同观点和法律体系的国家相互妥协的产物,必然兼顾现实主义和理想主义的主张,平衡国家主权利益和国际刑事法院刑事正义二者的要求,因而国际刑事法院管辖权制度具有矛盾性,具体体现为国际刑事法院管辖权实际运行的冲突与阻碍。国际刑事法院管辖权的矛盾是全球化时代主权体制国际社会的现实反映,其存在具有历史合理性,但此种矛盾也易为政治利用,权力有被滥用的危险。对待国际刑事法院的管辖权既要积极支持又须小心谨慎。 The jurisdiction of International Criminal Court(ICC) is the product of compromise from countries with different points of view and legal systems. Therefore' it has to take into account both realism and idealism and the requirement of the balance between the interests of national sovereignty and the criminal justice of ICC. As a result, the jurisdiction system of ICC is full of contradictions, which are naturally affected the practical exercise of ICC jurisdiction. The contradictions reflect the reality of the international communi- ty in the era of globalization; their existence has a historic rationale. However, the contradictions may be easily taken advantage of for political purposes, which can lead to the danger of abuse of power. We should hold a positive and prudent attitude towards the jurisdiction of ICC.
作者 刘健
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期83-88,共6页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(12YJA820041) 湖南省哲学社会科学基金重点项目(11ZDB067)阶段性成果
关键词 国际刑事法院管辖权 国家主权 国际社会 the jurisdiction of ICC national sovereignty the international community
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1International Criminal Court. Situations and Cases[EB/OL]. ht- tp ://www. icc- cpi. int/en_menus/iec/situations% 20and% 20cases/Pa- ges/situations% 20and% 20cases. aspx, 2014 - 08 - 20.
  • 2] L. Henkin. International Law : Politics and Values [ M ]. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995.
  • 3薛洪涛.国际刑事法院将矛头指向主权国家引发争议[DB/OL].法治周末.http://news.sina.corn.cn/w/sd/2010-12-14/234621641206.shmd.2013-5-10.
  • 4刘健.论国际刑事法院管辖权与国家主权[J].法律科学,2004,22(5):85-89. 被引量:10
  • 5Lieutenant Brett W. Johnson. The Future Constitutional Battle If the United States Retifies the International Criminal Court Treaty [ J ]. Journal of International and Compartive ,2003 ( 3 ).
  • 6Gillian Triggs. Implementation of the Rome State for the International Criminal Court: A Quiet Revolution in .ustralian [ J ]. The Sydney Law Review ,2003 ( 25 ).
  • 7Benjamin B. Ference. Misguided Fears about the International Crim- inal Court[ J ]. Pace International Law Review ,2003 (15).
  • 8刘健.论国际刑事法院管辖权的社会基础[J].时代法学,2008,6(6):88-93. 被引量:1
  • 9Alex Ward. The United States and International Criminal Court[ J ]. Santa Clara Law Review,2001 (41).
  • 10Michael J. Struett. The Transformation of State Sovereign Rights and Responsibilities Under the Rome Statue for the International Criminal Court[ J]. Chapman Law Review,2005 ( 8 ).

二级参考文献15

  • 1曾令良.国际法发展的历史性突破——《国际刑事法院规约》述评[J].中国社会科学,1999(2):141-152. 被引量:41
  • 2刘健.论国际刑事法院管辖权与国家主权[J].法律科学,2004,22(5):85-89. 被引量:10
  • 3张胜军.国际刑事法院的普遍管辖权与自由主义国际秩序[J].世界经济与政治,2006(8):20-25. 被引量:11
  • 4[14]Davis Scheffer.Blueprint for legal Reforms at the United Nations and the International Criminal Court.Georgetown Journal of International Law,2005 (36).
  • 5[1]Johan D.van der Vyver.Personal and Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.Emory International Law Review,2000(14).
  • 6[4]Roy S.Lee.The lnternational Crimimd Court--The Making of Roman Statue Issue,Negotiations,Results.London:Kluwer law International,1999.
  • 7[5]Bartram S.Brown.Primacy or Complementarity:Reconciling the Jurisdiction of National Courts and International Criminal Tribunals.The Yale Journal of International Law,1998 (23).
  • 8[6]Matthew D.Peter.The Proposed International Criminal Court:A Commentary on the legal and Political Debates Regarding Jurisdiction that Threaten the Establishment of an Effective Court.Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce,1997(24).
  • 9[7]Bruce Broomhall.International Justice and the Intematiorud Criminal Court:Between Sovereignty and the Rule of Law.New York:Oxford Univorsity Press,2003.
  • 10[9]Lieutenant Jon Stephens.Absence of Jurisdiction by the International Criminal Court Over the U.S.and Non-Signatory States.Naval Law Review,2005 (52).

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部