期刊文献+

文化批评视阈下的体裁分析研究图景

The Scenario of the Study of Genre Analysis from the Perspective of Cultural Criticism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 伯明翰学派文化批评理论洞察话语实践中权力与意识形态的运作,也体察结构性宰制和主体性协商与逆反之间的张力。从文化批评视角考察体裁分析三大流派:悉尼学派具有语言分析的优势,但需配合文化批评的"理论优势"对生活政治性地介入;专门用途英语学派着重语篇目的、功能的解读,也日益重视引入社会批判的维度;新修辞学派关注业务性语篇的写作,弱化了文化批评的立场。传统语言学强调真理性和规约性的逻辑,文化批评则秉持建构性与主体性的旨向。 The cultural criticism of Birmingham School of Cultural Studies is to examine the power and ideology in discursive practices, and appreciates the tension in terms of structural domination and the agency in negotiation and reversal. The three main schools of genre analysis are studied from this perspective: Syd-ney School is endowed with the advantage of linguistic analysis, but it shall be enhanced by theoretical prowess of cultural criticism so as to attain political engagement;The School of English for Specific Purposes focuses on the interpretation of the purpose and function of genre. Meanwhile, it introduced socio-critical dimension; New Rhetoric School highlights the wring of technical discourse, undermining the position of cultural criticism. Traditional linguistics emphasizes the mentality of truth and regulation while cultural criti-cism stresses the importance of construction and agency.
作者 赵宁
出处 《乐山师范学院学报》 2014年第9期75-80,共6页 Journal of Leshan Normal University
基金 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社科基金项目"伯明翰学派传媒文化研究的理论形态与个案研究"(项目编号:2011SJD750030)
关键词 文化批评 伯明翰学派 体裁分析 Cultural Criticism Birmingham School of Cultural Studies Genre Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Stuart H. et al. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order[M]. London: Macmillan Education. 1978: 238.
  • 2Hall, S. Cultural Studies : Two Paradigms[C]//Storey, j. (ed) What is Cultural Studies? : A Reader. London: Arnold. 1996: 31-48.
  • 3Hall, S. Encoding/Decoding [C]// Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (ed.): Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79. London: Hutchinson. 1980: 128-38.
  • 4Marcuse, H. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society[M]. Boston: Beacon Press. 1964: 6-9.
  • 5Fiske, J. Television Culture: Popular Pleasures and Politics[M]. London: Routledge. 1987: 84-95.
  • 6Martin, J. Gerrre and Language Learning: A Social Semiotic Perspective[J]. Linguistics and Education. 2009( 1 ) : 10-21.
  • 7Bhatia, V.. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings[M]. London: Longnlan. 1993:13.
  • 8Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power[M]. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erl- baum Associates. 1995: 1-24.
  • 9Halliday, M.A.K. Language as a social semiotic [M]. Baltimore, MD, University Park Press. 1978:1.
  • 10Sullivan, F. Critical theory and systemic linguistics: Textualizing the contact zone [J]. JAC: A Journal of Composition Theory, 1995 (3): 411-434.

二级参考文献8

  • 1[1]匡钊.批评理论[N].光明日报,2002-04-03.
  • 2[10]Lemann,Nicholas.The Big Test:The Secret History of the American Meritocracy[M].Higher Education in the United States:An Encyclopedia,2002; New York:ABC-CLIO Publishers,1999.
  • 3[13]Canale,M.1984."Testing in a communicative approach'in Gilbert A.Jarvis (ed,):The Challenge for Excellence in Foreign Language Education.Middlebury,Vt.:The Northeast Conference Organization:79-92.in Bachman,Lyle F.,Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing.1990 Oxford UP.语言测试要略[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,1999.
  • 4[1]廖平胜.考试是一门学问[N].光明日报,2004-11-18.
  • 5[7]Toulmin,S.Cosmopolis:The Hidden Agenda of Modernity[M].New York:Free Press,1990 in Spolsky,1995.
  • 6Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change [M]. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 7Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis [M].London: Longman.
  • 8Fairclough, N. & R. Wodak. 1997. Critical discourse analysis [A]. In van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction [C]. London: Sage Publications.

共引文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部