期刊文献+

基于协同救助的海上救助报酬合理分配方法 被引量:2

Research on the Equitable Apportionment of Marine Salvage Reward Based on Collaborative Rescue at Sea
原文传递
导出
摘要 海上救助报酬是为鼓励人们冒险参与海上救援,由受益人给予救助人的补偿和回报,具有射幸性,奉行"无效果、无报酬"的给付原则。本文以救助方成本性和非成本性投入对救助效果的贡献为依据,首先对各方的成本性投入进行补偿;然后从资源要素的关键性和参与人的重要性两个维度对各救助方的贡献进行综合评价,并按贡献度对"剩余"部分进行二次分配,两次分配之和即为各救助方所获得的分配总额。通过运用"重购成本"和Shapley值法分别对资源要素的关键性和参与人的重要性进行客观度量,该方法可同时解决共同救助报酬的外部分配与内部分配问题,不仅避免了目前各国司法实践中按成本投入比例进行分配的不合理性,也更能体现相关国际公约和国内立法有关救助报酬分配的原则。 Marine salvage reward aims to encourage volunteers to rescue properties in distress at sea following by "no cure no pay principle". Based on the equitable apportionment of the rewards,the effective rescue is benefited with sufficient collaboration by all salvors. In practice, the apportionment of rewards is normally calculated on the capital input of the co-salvors, neglecting the contribution of non-capital inputs. In this paper, a solution is present which compensates the capital input of each salvor firstly, then evaluates the contribution of non-capital inputs with two dimensions, which are the importance of the participants and the non-substitutable roles of their resources measured by the algorithm of Shapley value and re-purchase costs separately. This solution can be used for both external and interior apportionment of rewards among salvors and meeting the requests of the relevant international conventions and domestic law of each country thoroughly.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期74-81,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(13BGJ045)
关键词 海上救助报酬 无效果 无报酬 合理分配 重购成本 SHAPLEY值 marine salvage reward no cure no pay principle equitable apportionment re-purchase cost Shapley value
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1The madoera[R]. Lloyd's Law Report, 1946.
  • 2The rosa luxemburg[R]. Lloyd's Law Report, 1934.
  • 3The queen elizabeth[R]. Lloyd's Law Report,1949.
  • 4Lewins K,Derrington S, Mybught P, et al. Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law [J]. Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal, 2009, 23(1): 99- 110.
  • 5Joshua Teitelbaum. Inside the blackwall box:Explaining U. S marine salvage awards[R]. Economics and Regula- tory Law Research Paper,2013.
  • 6Lansakara F. Maritime law of salvage and adequacy of laws protecting the salvors ' interest [J]. International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Trans- portation, 2012,6(3) :431-435.
  • 7Parent J. No duty to save lives, no reward for rescue: Is that truly the current state of international salvage law? [J]. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law,2010,12(1) :87-139.
  • 8任律珍,唐一雄.论海难救助报酬的估算与分配[J].水运管理,2004,26(8):17-20. 被引量:3
  • 9王秋阳.完善海难救助报酬分配的若干思考[J].中国航海,2004,27(1):19-22. 被引量:3
  • 10魏鑫.论海难救助中的报酬问题[J].法制与社会(旬刊),2012(16):98-99. 被引量:1

二级参考文献79

共引文献75

同被引文献16

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部