期刊文献+

具有损失规避零售商的模糊供应链网络均衡 被引量:10

Supply chain network equilibrium with loss-averse retailers under fuzzy demand
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对模糊市场需求情形,研究具有损失规避行为零售商的无缺货成本的供应链网络均衡问题.利用模糊事件的可信性测度理论,推导具有分段线性效用函数损失规避零售商的模糊期望效用模型,揭示其凹性性质.利用变分不等式理论,描述制造商、零售商和消费者的最优行为,进而构建网络均衡模型.为了简化网络均衡条件,揭示了制造商与零售商内生交易定价机制的等价关系.最后,利用数值分析表明了市场需求的模糊性和损失规避系数对网络均衡的影响. Under the condition of fuzzy demand, the supply chain network equilibrium, in which loss-averse retailers' shortage cost is not involved, is examined. The expected utility model of retailers with the piecewise-linear loss aversion utility function is derived by the credibility measure of the fuzzy event, and its concavity property is revealed. The optimal behaviors of manufactures, retailers and consumers are modeled by the variational inequality, and the network equilibrium model is built. It is proved that manufactures' pricing mechanisms are equivalent to retailers' at equilibrium in order to simplify network equilibrium conditions. Finally, a numerical example shows the impact of fuzzy demand and loss-averse coefficients on network equilibrium.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期1899-1906,共8页 Control and Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71371102) 国际(地区)合作与交流项目(71311120090) 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2012GM002)
关键词 供应链网络 损失规避 变分不等式 模糊需求 supply chain network loss aversion variational inequality fuzzy demand
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Nagurney A, Dong J, Zhang D. A supply chain network equilibrium model[J]. Transportation Research: Part E, 2002, 38(5): 281-303.
  • 2Dong J, Zhang D, Nagumey A. A supply chain network equilibrium model with random demand[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2004, 156(1): 194-212.
  • 3杨跃翔,夏国平,卫昆.双渠道两阶段供应链网络均衡模型[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(9):1391-1395. 被引量:9
  • 4滕春贤,姚锋敏,胡宪武.具有随机需求的多商品流供应链网络均衡模型的研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(10):77-83. 被引量:75
  • 5胡劲松,徐元吉.考虑产能约束的模糊供应链网络均衡研究[J].管理学报,2012,9(1):139-143. 被引量:12
  • 6胡劲松,徐元吉,刘芳霞,王丛丛.具有模糊需求的多商品流供应链网络均衡研究[J].控制与决策,2012,27(5):665-672. 被引量:23
  • 7Nagumey A, Matsypura D. Global supply chain network dynamics with multicriteria decision-making under risk and uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2005, 41(6): 585- 612.
  • 8Zhang L P, Zhou Y. A new approach to supply chain network equilibrium models[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2012, 63(1): 82-88.
  • 9Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263- 291.
  • 10Schweitzer M E, Cachon G P. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence[J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(3): 404-420.

二级参考文献60

共引文献202

同被引文献121

引证文献10

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部