期刊文献+

智能最佳 kV 联合自动管电流调节技术在眼眶 CT 扫描中的应用价值 被引量:13

The clinical application value of CARE kV combined with CARE Dose 4D techniques in the orbital CT scan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨自动管电流调节(CARE Dose 4D)联合智能最佳kV(CARE kV)技术在眼眶CT检查中的临床应用价值。方法:将行眼眶CT检查的70例患者分为两组,A组(35例)采用CARE Dose 4D扫描技术,B组(35例)采用CARE kV联合CARE Dose 4D扫描技术。比较A、B两组图像质量(平均CT值、噪声SD、SNR、CNR、图像质量主观评分)、患者所接受的辐射剂量及病变检出率。结果:A、B两组辐射剂量差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组[(0.59±1.55)mSv]较A组[(0.71±1.84)mSv]ED较少约15.9%。两组平均CT值、噪声SD、SNR、CNR、图像质量评分及病变检出率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:联合CARE kV与CARE Dose 4D技术行眼眶CT扫描,在保证图像质量的同时,可有效降低辐射剂量。 To explore the clinical application value of CARE Dose 4D (tube current regulation technique) combined with CARE kV (the smart kV scanning technology)in orbital CT scan,expecting to reduce the radiation dose. Methods:70 patients underwent plain orbital CT scan,they were randomly divided into two groups according to chronologi-cal sequence.In group A (n=35 cases),applied CARE Dose 4D technique was used only;In group B (n=35 cases),applied both CARE Dose 4D and CARE kV technique was used.Comparison of radiation dose and image quality (based on average CT values,Noise SD,SNR,CNR and quality score)between the two groups were made.Results:The difference of radiation dose between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05);ED of group B was less than those of group A by a-round 16.9%.There were no significant differences between the two groups in average CT values,SD,SNR and CNR (P〉0.05);Also the image quality score and lesion detection rate demonstrated no significant difference among the two groups. Conclusion:On the premise of obtaining good quality of image for diagnosis,CARE kV combined with CARE Dose 4D tech-nology can be applied in orbital CT scan,which will reduce about 15.9% radiation dose.
出处 《放射学实践》 2014年第9期1035-1038,共4页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 眼眶 体层摄影术 X 线计算机 辐射剂量 Orbit Tomography,X-ray computed Radiation dosage
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure[J]. N Engl J M,2007,357(22) :2277-2284.
  • 2Hein E,Rogalla P,Kingebiel R,et al. Computed tomography spiral CT low-dose CT paranasal sinuses radiation dose eye lens radio- protection[J]. Eur Radiol, 2002,12(7) : 1693-1696.
  • 3Menzel H, Schihilla H, Teunen D, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography[M]. Luxembourg:Eu- ropean Commission,2000 : 162-163.
  • 4Price RR,Axel L,Morgan T,et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance Imaging: report of AAPM nu- clear magnetic resonance task Group No. 1 [J]. Med Phys, 1990, 17(2) :287-295.
  • 5Pierce DA, Preston DL. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors[J]. Radiat Res, 2000,154 ( 2 ) : 178- 186.
  • 6Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially as sociated with full-body CT screening [J]. Radiology, 2004, 232(3):735-738.
  • 7曾宪春,何波,康绍磊,谢晓洁,韩丹.基于原始数据的迭代重建技术在眼眶CT平扫中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(6):1019-1022. 被引量:4
  • 8曾宪春,张俊,韩丹,王勇,赵讯冉.多层螺旋CT眼眶扫描参数优化的离体标本实验研究[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2013,21(7):497-500. 被引量:9
  • 9Hundt W,Rust FP,Stabler AM,et al. Dose reduction in multislice computed tomography[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2005,29 (1) : 140-147.
  • 10Winklehner A, Goetti R, Baumueller S, et al. Automated attenua tion-based tube potential selection for thoracoabdominal compu ted tomography angiography:improved dose effectiveness[J]. In vest Radiol,2011,46(12) :767-773.

二级参考文献36

  • 1Slovis TL.CT and computed radiography:the pictures aregreat,but is the radiation dose greater than required?[J].Am JRoentgenol,2002,179(1):39-41.
  • 2Kalra MK,Maher MM,Toth TL,et al.Strategies for CT radiationdose optimization[J].Radiology.2004,230(3):619-628.
  • 3Brix G,Lechel U,Petersheim M,et al.Dynamic contrast-enhancedCT studies:balancing patient exposure and image noise[J].InvestRadiol.2011,46(1):64-70.
  • 4Yu L,Li H,Fletcher JG,et al.Automatic selection of tube potentialfor radiation dose reduction in CT:a general strategy[J].MedPhys,2010,37(1):234-243.
  • 5Kalender WA,Deak P,Kellermeier M,et al.Application-andpatient size-dependent optimization of X-ray spectra for CT[J].Med Phys,2009,36(3):993-1007.
  • 6Alkadhi H,Schindera ST.State of the art low-dose CTangiography of the body[J].Eur J Radiol,2011,80(1):36-40.
  • 7Winklehner A,Goetti R,Baumueller S,et al.Automatedattenuation-based tube potential selection for thoracoabdominalcomputed tomography angiography:improved doseeffectiveness[J].Invest Radiol,2011,46(12):767-773.
  • 8CAREkV(computer program).Version syngo CT 2011 A(VA40)[M].Forchheim,Germany:Siemens Healthcare,2011.
  • 9Alibek S,Brand M,Suess C,et al.Dose reduction in pediatriccomputed tomography with automated exposure control[J].AcadRadiol2011,Jun,18(6):690-693.
  • 10Smith AB,Dillon WP,Gould R,et al.Radiation dose-reductionstrategies for neuroradiology CT protocols[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2007,28(9):1628-1632.

共引文献39

同被引文献95

  • 1韩本谊,江笑露,李宏儒.螺旋CT扫描在牙齿正畸中的临床应用价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(2):161-164. 被引量:34
  • 2Winklehner A,Goetti R, Baumueller S, et al. Automated attenua- tion based tube potential selection for thoraeoahdominal computed tomography angiography.- improved dose effectiveness[J]. Invest Radiol,2011,46(12) :767 773.
  • 3Willis CE, Slovis TL.The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR : dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams-a white paper con- ference [ J :.AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005,18 (2) : 373-374.
  • 4Kim SM, Haider MA, Milosevic M, et al.A method for patient dose reduction in dynamic contrast enhanced CT study [J]. Med Phys, 201 1,38(9) :5094-5103.
  • 5Heliou R, Normandeau L, Beaudoin G. Towards dose reduction in CT : patient radiation dose assessment for CT examinations at univer- sity health center in Canada and comparison with national diagnos- tic reference levels [J].Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2012, 48 (2) : 202-210.
  • 6Behrendt FF, Schmidt B, Plumhans C, et al. Image fusion in dual en- ergy computed tomography : effect on contrast enhancement, signl-to-noise ratio and image quality in computed tomography angiography [J:. Invest Radio1,2009,44( 1 ) : 1-6.
  • 7Menzel H, Schibilla H, Teunen D, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography : C ]. Luxembourg: Europe- an Commission,2000,12(2) : 160-162.
  • 8Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure [ J :. N Engl J Med, 2007,357 (22) : 2277-2284.
  • 9Winklehner A, Goetti R, Baumueller S, et al. Automated attenua- tion- based tube potential selection for thoracoabdominal comput- ed tomography angiography: improved dose effectiveness [J 1 .Invest Radiol, 2011,46 ( 12 ) : 767-773.
  • 10Alibek S, Brand M, Suess C, et al. Dose reduction in pediatric com- puted tomography with automated exposure control [J]. Acad Ra- diol, 2011,18(6) :690-693.

引证文献13

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部