期刊文献+

健康教育模式在全胃切除术后患者院外生活质量改善中的意义 被引量:3

Health education improves quality of life outside the hospital in patients after total gastrectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:本研究旨在探究健康教育模式在全胃切除术后患者院外生活质量改善中的意义.方法:选取2013-04/2014-04于承德医学院附属医院诊断为胃癌并进行全胃切除手术的患者100例进行前瞻性临床研究,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组50例.研究组采用延续性健康教育模式进行院外护理,而对照组采取常规护理,并记录两组患者生活质量评分以及血液生化检查.两组患者在年龄、性别、肿瘤分期(TNM分期)及心血管、呼吸道疾病等方面均无统计学差异(P>0.05),具有可比性.结果:两组患者术后1 mo时躯体功能、角色功能、情绪功能、认知功能、社会功能以及不良症状和总体健康水平等方面相比无明显差异(t=0.829,0.227,0.446,0.357,0.295,1.223,1.112,1.287,0.111,0.329,1.980,0.229,0.723,0.567,均P>0.05).而在术后3 mo后,研究组的躯体功能等生活质量较对照组均明显升高,在不良症状以及总健康水平方面,研究组均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(t=2.345,2.172,2.118,1.978,1.885,2.547,3.779,1.569,2.509,2.160,2.980,2.511,2.151,均P<0.05).在术后3mo时,研究组患者的体质量、总蛋白及白蛋白等均有所升高,其差值变化优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(t=2.673,3.547,3.981,均P<0.05),而血液血红蛋白值在两组患者中无明显差异(t=0.045,P>0.05).结论:延续性健康教育可有效提高患者院外生活质量和患者自身内环境,值得广泛推广. AIM: To explore the significance of health educa-tion in the patients outside the hospital to im-prove the quality of life after total gastrectomy.METHODS: One hundred patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and underwent total gastrectomy at our hospital between April 2013 and April 2014 were randomly di-vided into either a study group or a control group,with 50 patients in each group.The study group was given continued health edu-cation outside the hospital,while the control group received routine care.The quality of life score and blood tests of the two groups were recorded.RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age,gender,tumor stage(TNM stage) andcardiovascular or respiratory diseases between the two groups(P〉0.05).There were also no significant differences between the two groups in physical function,role function,emotional function,cognitive function,social function,negative symptoms and other aspects one month after surgery(t = 0.829,0.227,0.446,0.357,0.295,1.223,1.112,1.287,0.111,0.329,1.980,0.229,0.723,0.567,P〉0.05).However,three months after surgery,the physical features,such as quality of life,were significantly improved in the study group compared with the control group.The levels of negative symptoms in terms of overall health were also significantly better in the study group than in the control group(t = 2.345,2.172,2.118,1.978,1.885,2.547,3.779,1.569,2.509,2.160,2.980,2.511,2.151,P〈0.05).After three months,the weight,total protein and albumin were sig-nificantly better in the study group than in the control group(t = 2.673,3.547,3.981; P〈0.05),although blood hemoglobin showed no signifi-cant difference(t = 0.045,P〉0.05) between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Continued health education can improve the quality of life outside the hos-pital in patients after total gastrectomy.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第23期3470-3474,共5页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 全胃切除术 健康教育模式 生活质量 Total gastrectomy Health education Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Kim H, Suh EE, Lee HJ, Yang HK. The effects of patient participation-based dietary intervention on nutritional and functional status for patients with gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Can- cer Nurs ,2014, 37:E10-E20 [PMID: 23632471 DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31829193c8].
  • 2Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Watanabe M, Okutomi T, Wang G, Bax L. Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by ex- pert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese pa- tients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized dinical trial. Surg Endosc ,2013, 27:1695-1705 [PMID: 23247737 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2658-9].
  • 3杨金铭.全胃切除功能性间置空肠代胃术42例围手术期健康教育.中国美容医学,2010,19:193-193.
  • 4So EY, Park HA. Exploring the Possibility of Information Sharing between the Medical and Nursing Domains by Mapping Medical Records to SNOMED CT and ICNP. Healthc Inform Res ,2011, 17" 156-161 [PMID: 22084810 DOI: 10.4258/ hit.2011.17.3.156].
  • 5Mello BS, Lucena Ade F, Echer IC, Luzia Mde F. [Patients with gastric cancer submitted to gastecto- my: an integrative review]. Rev Gaucha Enferm ,2010, 31:803-811 [PMID: 21805893].
  • 6刘洪敏,赵岳,詹宏杰,李娜,王会英.胃癌病人全胃切除术后延续性健康教育对近期生活质量及生理指标的影响[J].护理研究(上旬版),2013,27(5):1262-1264. 被引量:25
  • 7胡双玲,钱惠玉.饮食护理干预对全胃切除术后饮食相关并发症的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2012,16(16):19-20. 被引量:15
  • 8刘素君.全胃切除术后患者早期肠内营养支持的健康教育效果观察[J].中外医学研究,2013,11(1):91-92. 被引量:5
  • 9Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleish- man SB, de Haes JC. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer lnst 1993; BS: 365-376 [PMID: 8433390 DO/: 10.1093/jnci/ B5.5.365].
  • 10Park IS, Yoo CS, Joo YH, Woo KS, Choi WH, Kang HS, Jung MR, Kim H-J, Lee SH, Aim SY, Park MO. Evaluation of the completeness of the nursing process for patients having gastrectomy using elec- tronic nursing records. Stud Health Technol Inform ,2009, 146:739-740 [PMID: 19592955 DOh 10.3233/9 78-1-60750-024-7-739].

二级参考文献50

共引文献109

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部