期刊文献+

中文版言语障碍指数量表的信效度评价 被引量:5

Reliability and validation of Chinese version of Speech Handicap Index
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价中文版言语障碍指数(Speech Handicap Index,SHI)量表的信度和效度。方法采用跨文化量表翻译流程对英文版SHI量表进行前译、回译,形成中文版SHI量表,对97例喉咽癌术后6个月内的患者及32名健康志愿者进行调查。结果中文版SHI量表总的Cronbach′sα系数为0.91,2个维度的Cronbach′sα系数分别为0.82、0.93;总量表重测信度为0.73;内容效度为0.90;量表的区分效度较好(P<0.01)。中文版SHI临界值为6分时筛查言语障碍者的灵敏度和特异度分别为0.950和0.914,ROC曲线下面积为0.945(95%CI:0.899,0.990,P<0.01)。结论中文版SHI量表信、效度好,有合适的临界值,可作为言语障碍者自我评估、临床筛查及科研应用的有效工具。未来的研究可进行量表结构效度及反应度的检验,以供语言干预治疗的效果评价。 Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Speech Handicap Index (SHI). Methods The English SHI was translated into Chinese according to the cross-cultural adaptation procedure and used to investigate 97 outpatients with hypopharyngeal cancer no more than 6 months after surgery and 32 healthy controls. Results Cronbachls alpha coefficients were found to be 0.91, 0.82 and 0.93 for the total scale and both two dimensions respectively; the test-retest reliability for the total scale was 0. 73. Besides, content validity index for all items was 0.90, with the discriminate validity proven to be good (P〈 0.01). Whatts more, a cut-off score of 6 points was evident to identify patients with speech problem, with sensitivity of 0. 950, specificity of 0. 914 and the area under the curve (AUC) 0. 945 (95% CI:0. 899, 0. 990, P〈0.01). Conclusion The Chinese version of the SHI is a reliable and valid measurement with appropriate cut-off score. We recommend it to be used as a tool to screen speech disorder among hypopharyngeal cancer patients. Future studies are needed to assess its construct validity and response validity, thus, evaluation of the effect of speech intervention could be fulfilled.
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 2014年第18期28-31,共4页
基金 复旦大学附属眼耳鼻喉科医院护理科研基金资助项目(HL201303)
关键词 口咽肿瘤 喉咽肿瘤 言语障碍 言语障碍指数量表 信度 效度 oropharyngeal neoplasms hypopharyngeal carcinoma speech disorder Speech Handicap Index reliability^validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Rinkel R N, Leeuw I M, van Reij E J, et al. Speech handi- cap index in patients with oral and pharyngeal cancer: better understanding of patientsp complaints[J]. Head Neck, 2008, 30(7) :868-874.
  • 2Dwivedi R C, St Rose S, Roe J W, et al. First report on the reliability and validity of Speech Handicap Index in native English-speaking patients with head and neck cancer[J]. Head Neck, 2011,33 (3) : 341-348.
  • 3Borggreven P A, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, Langendijk J A, et al. Speech outcome after surgical treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a longitudinal assessment of patients reconstructed by a microvascular flap[J]. Head Neck, 2005,27 (9) : 785-793.
  • 4Lundstrom E, Hammarberg B. Speech and voice after laryn- gectomy: perceptual and acoustical analyses of tracheoesop- hageal speech related to voice handicap index[J]. Folia Pho- niatr Logop,2011,63(2) :98-108.
  • 5Wehb A L, Carding P N, Deary I L, et al. The rdiahili- ty of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2004,261 (8) : 429-434.
  • 6Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, et al. Quali- ty of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Canc- er Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35 [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999,17(3) : 1008-1019.
  • 7Rogers S N, Lowe D, Brown J S, et al. The University of Washington head and neck cancer measure as a predic- tor of outcome following primary surgery for oral cancer [J]. Head Neck, 1999,21(5): 394-401.
  • 8Sperber A D. Translation and validation of study instru- ments for cross-cultural research[J]. Gastroenterology, 2004,126(1 Suppl 1) :S124-S128.
  • 9Polit D F, Beck C T, Owen S V. Is the CVI an accepta- ble indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recom- mendations[J]. Res Nuts Health, 2007,30 (4) : 459-467.
  • 10Zweig M H, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteris- tic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine[J]. Clin Chem,1993,39(4) :561-577.

二级参考文献10

  • 1夏庆华,唐传喜,钮春瑾,徐妙珍.社区老年人跌倒情况及危险因素研究[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2006,14(3):207-209. 被引量:69
  • 2刘海萍,张敏.压疮高危因素的量化评价[J].护理学杂志,2006,21(17):22-23. 被引量:51
  • 3Julie M, Julie R, David H C, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the secondary prevention of falls in older adults[J].Gerontology, 2003,49 (2) : 93-117.
  • 4Wagner E H, Laeroix A Z, Grothaus L,et al. Preventing disability and falls in older adults: a population-based randomized trial[J].Am J Public Health, 1994,84 (11) 1800-1806.
  • 5Russell M A, Hill K D, Blackberry I, et al. The reliabi lity and predictive accuracy of the falls risk for older peo ple in the community assessment (FROP-Com) toot [ J ]. Age Ageing, 2008,37 (6) : 634-639.
  • 6National Patient Safety Agency. Slips trips and falls in hospital[M]. London : NPSA, 2007 : 1.
  • 7Oliver D, Daly F, Martin F C, et al. Risk factors and risk assessment tools for falls in hospital in-patients: a systematic review[J]. Age Ageing, 2004, 33 (2) : 122- 130.
  • 8汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[M]增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志出版社,1999.120-129.
  • 9王利维,周立.社区老年人跌倒危险评估工具的信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2011,26(10):89-91. 被引量:8
  • 10庞继艾,周金芳,黄海燕.电吹风在小儿臀红护理中的应用[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2002,17(1):55-55. 被引量:12

共引文献35

同被引文献43

  • 1边学,徐震纲,吕春梅,唐平章,罗健.头颈肿瘤与外科治疗对患者生存质量的影响[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2005,40(8):606-610. 被引量:25
  • 2肖红俊,孔维佳,汪广平,杨成章,龚树生,王彦君,李明.喉癌切除术后患者的生存质量[J].中国康复,2006,21(1):37-38. 被引量:26
  • 3杨小平,秦柳花,王惠珍,杨丽凤.临床护理专家认证评价指标体系的信度和效度考评[J].护理研究(上旬版),2006,20(3):593-596. 被引量:23
  • 4沈曲,李峥.休斯顿疼痛情况调查表信度和效度的研究[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(11):1049-1051. 被引量:182
  • 5郑家伟,李金忠,钟来平,张志愿.口腔鳞状细胞癌临床流行病学研究现状[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2007,5(2):83-90. 被引量:88
  • 6Rinkel R N, Leeuw I M, van Reij E J, et al. Speech handi- cap index in patients with oral and pharyngeal cancer:better understanding of patients' complaints[J]. Head Neck,2008, 30(7) :868-874.
  • 7Dwivedi R C, Kazi R A, Agrawal N, et al. Evaluation of speech outcomes following treatment of oral and oropha- ryngeal cancers[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2009,35 (5) : 417- 424.
  • 8Pusic A, Liu J C, Chen C M, et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in head and neck cancer surgery[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2007, 136(4) :525-535.
  • 9Borggreven P A, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, Langendijk J A, et al. Speech outcome after surgical treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a longitudinal assessment of patients reconstructed by a microvascular flap[J]. Head Neck, 2005,27 (9) : 785-793.
  • 10Suarez-Cunqueiro M M, Schramm A, Schoen R, et al. Speech and swallowing impairment after treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer [J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2008,134(12) :1299-304.

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部