期刊文献+

时间压力与研发人员创新行为关系的探讨——基于资源保存理论的调节模型

Discussion on relationshipbetween time pressure and innovation behavior of research and development employee——A moderated model based on conservation of resource theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以研发人员为研究对象,以资源保存理论为基本框架构建概念模型。将心理资本和组织创新氛围作为时间压力与研发人员创新行为关系的边界条件,从理论上分析这两个情境变量与时间压力的交互作用对研发人员创新行为的影响。分析认为,在研发人员心理资本水平比较高或者在积极的组织创新氛围下,时间压力对研发人员创新行为具有正向影响,相反,则具有负向影响。最后,对未来研究进行了展望,认为对此问题展开实证研究,或者探讨二者的中介机制将成为未来研究的重要方向。 To take the research and development( RD) employee as research object,this paper constructs theoretical model based on conservation of resource theory,and looks psychological capital of RD employee and organizational creative climate as boundary conditions of relationship between time pressure and innovation behavior of RD employee. The interaction of contextual variables such as psychological capital and organizational creative climate and time pressure,as well as the influence of the interaction on innovation behavior of RD employee are analyzed. It is considered that when psychological capital of RD employee is very high or when RD employees are in a positive organizational creative climate,time pressure has a positive impact on innovation behavior of RD employee. Conversely,time pressure has a negative impact on innovation behavior of RD employee. Finally,the future research is prospected. The paper believes the empirical study or intermediation study on relationship between the two variables will be important study direction.
作者 李凤莲
出处 《齐鲁工业大学学报》 CAS 2014年第3期81-83,共3页 Journal of Qilu University of Technology
基金 山东省软科学研究计划项目(2013RKB01405) 山东省软科学研究计划项目(2013RKB01386) 山东省统计科研重点课题(KT13057)
关键词 时间压力 研发人员 创新行为 资源保存理论 time pressure research and development employee innovation behavior conservation of resource theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1Ekavll, G., 1996, "Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, pp.105-123.
  • 2Neil R. Anderson & Michael A. West, 1998, "Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation: Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, pp.235-258.
  • 3Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H.,Lazenby, J. & Herron, M., 1996, "Assessing the Work Enviornment for Creativity", Academy of Management Journal, vol.39(5), pp.1154-1184.
  • 4Isaksen, S. G., Lauer K. J. & Ekvall, G., 1999, "Situational Outlook Questionnaire: A Measure of the Climate for Creativity and Change", Psychological Reports, 85, pp.665-674.
  • 5Amabile, T. M., 1997, "Motivating Creativity in Organizations", California Management Review, vol. 40(1), pp.22-26.
  • 6Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A., 1994, "Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Work Place", Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp.580-607.
  • 7Onne Janssen, 2000, "Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-reward Fairness and Innovative work Behavior", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, pp.287-302.
  • 8Amabile, T. M., 1993, "Motivational Synergy: Toward New Conceptualizations of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in the Workplace", Human Resource Management Review, 3, pp. 185-201.
  • 9Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R., 1976, "Motivation Through the Design of Work", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, pp.250-279.
  • 10Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M., 1985, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior, New York: Plenum.

共引文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部