期刊文献+

交互式清创在腹部外科手术切口感染伴组织坏死患者中的应用效果比较 被引量:8

A comparative study of application effect of interactive debridement in patients with abdominal surgical incision infection and tissue necrosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨交互式清创方法在腹部外科手术切口感染患者创面治疗及护理中的应用效果.方法 将2010年5月至2013年12月在四川大学华西医院胃肠外科住院接受腹部外科手术,术后切口感染伴组织坏死的54例患者分为2组,23例接受交互式清创伤口治疗的为观察组,31例采用传统敷料高渗盐水纱布清创的为对照组,比较2组患者伤口清创完成时间,伤口愈合速度,伤口愈合时间,至伤口清创完成止总换药频次、费用.结果 观察组的清创期明显短于对照组,且伤口愈合速度快于对照组;至清创完成为止对照组患者所接受换药次数多于观察组;虽然交互式清创单次换药费用高于高渗盐水纱布清创换药,但总的换药费用观察组低于对照组.结论 交互式清创在腹部外科手术切口感染患者伤口治疗及护理中应用效果良好,安全有效,值得在临床推广. Objective To study the interactive debridement methods in treatment and nursing of the wound in patients with abdominal surgical incision infection.Methods In May 2010 to December 2013 in West China hospital of Sichuan University,54 patients with postoperative incision infection accompanied with tissue necrosis after gastrointestinal surgery were divided into two groups,23 cases who accepted interactive debridement treatment were set as the observation group,31 cases with traditional dressing hypertonic saline gauze debridement were named as the control group.The wound debridement completion time,wound healing velocity,wound healing time,dressing change frequency and cost were compared between two groups of patients.Results Compared with those of the control group,in the observation group,the wound debridement completion time was shorter,wound healing velocity was faster,dressing change frequency was longer.Although single dressing change cost was higher in the observation group,but the total dressing change cost was lower compared with the control group.Conclusions The interactive debridement methods used in treatment and nursing of patients with abdominal surgical incision infection showed good effect and safety,which is worthy of wide clinical application.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2014年第26期36-38,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 感染 交互式清创 湿性愈合 伤口治疗 Infection Interactive debridement Wet healing Wound treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献47

共引文献51

同被引文献96

  • 1周澜,秦玲,杭凌.湿性疗法治愈三例乳癌术后难愈伤口的报告[J].护士进修杂志,2008,23(17):1628-1629. 被引量:8
  • 2Nashan B, Citterio F. Wound healing complications and the use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a critical review of the literature [ J ]. Transplantation, 2012,94(6) : 547-561.
  • 3Eskens FA,Sleijfer S. The use of bevacizumab in colorectal, lung, breast, renal and ovarian cancer: where does it fit? [ J ].Eur J Cancer, 2008,44(16) : 2350 - 2356.
  • 4Geiger- Gritsch S, Stollenwerk B, Miksad R, et al. Safety of Bevacizumab in patients with advanced cancer: a meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. Oncologist, 2010,15 ( 11 ) : 1179 - 1191.
  • 5Kamba T , McDonald DM. Mechanisms of adverse effects of anti - VEGF therapy for cancer [J]. Br J Cancer,2007,96 (12):1788- 1795.
  • 6Ferrara N,Hillan KJ,Novotny W. Bevacizumab (Avastin),a humanized anti- VEGF monoclonal antibody for cancer therapy [ J ]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2005,333 (2) : 328- 335.
  • 7Scappaticci FA, Fehrenbacher L, Cartwfight T, et al. Surgical wound healing complications in metastatic coloreetal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab[ J ]. J Surg Oncol, 2005,91 ( 3 ) : 173-180.
  • 8Hurwitz HI,Tebbutt NC,Kabbinavar F,et al. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis from seven randomized controlled trials [ J]. Oneologist, 2013,18 (9) : 1004 - 1012.
  • 9Lyons SP. Toxicity results and early outcome data on a randomized phase II study of docetaxel +/- bevacizumab for locally advanced, unresectable breast cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol,2006,24(18suppl): S131.
  • 10Barami K,Fernandes R. Incidence, risk factors and management of delayed wound dehiscence after craniotomy for tumor resection [J]. J Clin Neurosci,2012,19(6) : 854- 857.

引证文献8

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部