期刊文献+

七里海湿地植物种间关系的数量分析 被引量:6

Numerical Analysis of Plants Interspecific Relationships in Qilihai Wetland
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在野外样方调查的基础上,采用χ2检验和Spearman秩相关分析方法,研究了七里海湿地40种主要植物,共780个种对间关联和相关关系。χ2检验结果有357个种对呈正相关,423个种对呈负相关;Spearman秩相关分析检验结果有356个种对呈正相关,有424个种对呈负相关。二者结果一致,与χ2检验相比,Spearman秩相关分析法更为灵敏。七里海湿地主要植物种具有显著相关性的种对数(279对)占总种对数(780对)的比例较低,为35.77%,说明大多数种间关系松散,种对间的独立性较强,植被可能处于退化状态。40个主要植物种可以划分为3个生态种组,各生态种组内的种有相似的资源利用方式和生态要求,各种组间有相互转化和演替的趋势。 Based on the data resources investigated from the field, the interspecific relationships among 780 species pairs, which belong to 40 dominant plant species of Qilihai wetland vegetation were analyzed by using methods of x2-test and Spearman's rank correlation analysis. The results showed that. (1) Analyzed by 2 test, there were positive correlation for 357 pair-species and negative correlation for 423 pair-species. (2) By applying Spearman's rank correlation analysis, there were positive correlations for 356 pair-species and nega- tive correlations for 424 pair-species Analyzed by. It clearly demonstrated that the 2 test methods derived similar results. Compared with E2-test, Spearman's correlation coefficient was more sensitive. The proportion of significant correlated species pair was 35.77%, which indicated that most of the species were independently distributed and had a loose relationship with each other. This further indicated that the vegetation might be in a state of degradation. The 40 dominant species were divided into 3 ecological species groups. Species in the same ecological species group had the same way of resources utilization and biology require- ment. However, we observed that species belonging to different groups had the trend of succession and transform into each other.
出处 《水土保持通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期70-75,共6页 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"低碳理念下基于人工智能的城市空间结构热岛效应模拟预测"(51278330) 天津市自然科学基金重点项目(11JCZDJC24500)
关键词 七里海湿地 植物群落 种间关联 生态种组 Qilihai wetland plant community interspecific association ecological species group
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1王伯荪.植物种群学[M].广东广州:中山大学出版社,1989.
  • 2Greig S P. Quantitative Plant Ecology [M]. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1983.
  • 3高永恒,曾晓阳,周国英,王根绪.长江源区高寒湿地植物群落主要种群种间关系分析[J].湿地科学,2011,9(1):1-7. 被引量:42
  • 4Moore P D, Chapman S B. Methods in plant ecology [M]. 2nd. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1986.
  • 5Dice L R. Measure of the amount of ecological associa- tion between species[J]. Ecology, 1945,26 (3): 297- 302.
  • 6Schluter D. A variance test for detecting species associa- tion with some example applications [J]. Ecology, 1984,65 (3) : 998-1005.
  • 7Mourad M M, Sharawy S W. The interspecific relation- ships of Astragalus species in Egypt assessed by the morphoanatomical characters of the pod [J]. Feddes Repertorium, 2010,121(1/2) : 38-58.
  • 8Myster R W, Pickett S T A. Dynamics of associations between plants in ten old fields during 31 years of suc- cession[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1992,80(2):291-302.
  • 9郭志华,卓正大,陈洁,吴梅凤.庐山常绿阔叶、落叶阔叶混交林乔木种群种间联结性研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21(5):424-432. 被引量:193
  • 10邓贤兰,刘玉成,吴杨.井冈山自然保护区栲属群落优势种群的种间联结关系研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(4):531-536. 被引量:91

二级参考文献200

共引文献503

同被引文献105

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部