期刊文献+

河岸植被缓冲带完整性及恢复措施——以北京市密云水库上游潮白河流域为例 被引量:7

Integrity and Restoration Countermeasures of Riparian Vegetation Buffers——A Case Study on Chaobai River Basin in Up-stream of Miyun Reservoir in Beijing City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对潮白河流域22个断面的调查分析,根据潮白河河道断面形态、河岸土地利用类型及岸坡坡度等条件,将潮白河河道断面划分为:U形+缓坡、U形+陡坡、U形+陡坎、V形+陡坡和漫滩型,并对潮白河河岸植被缓冲带完整性进行了评价。结果显示,潮河河段内植被缓冲带完整性较差,以次不完整状况为主;白河河段内河岸植被缓冲带状况相对较好,大部分调查断面内植被缓冲带为基本完整及完整状态。针对潮白河河岸植被缓冲带存在的问题,提出了潮白河流域不同河岸带断面类型植被缓冲带的恢复对策。 After investigating 22 river cross-sections in Chaobai River basin, according to the river section morphology, riparian land use types, riparian slop and other conditions, the river section morphology was divided into U-shaped + gentle slope, U-shaped + steep slope, U-shaped + scarp, V-shaped + steep slope and flood-plain-types. Furthermore, the riparian forest buffers integrity of Chaohe River was assessed. The results showed that the vegetation buffer in poor condition in Chaohe River, mainly seq-incomplete; riparian forest buffers in relatively good condition within Baihe River, most of the investigation sections of the vegetation buffer were in basic integrity and integrity state. According to the existing problems, restoration countermeasure of different river section in Chaobai River basin was put forward.
出处 《水土保持通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期178-183,共6页 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 北京市教育委员会"北京市典型河流滨水缓冲带土壤生物工程措施试验研究"
关键词 河岸植被缓冲带 河岸断面 完整性评价 植被恢复 riparian vegetation buffer river cross-section integrity assessment vegetation restoration
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Naiman R J, Decamps H, Polloek M. The role of ripari- an corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity [J]. Ecologieal Applications,1993, 3(2) :209-212.
  • 2张建春.河岸带功能及其管理[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(6):143-146. 被引量:136
  • 3夏继红,严忠民.生态河岸带的概念及功能[J].水利水电技术,2006,37(5):14-17. 被引量:68
  • 4Correll D L, Jordan T E, Weller D E. Nutrient flux in a landscape: Effects of coastal land use and terrestrial community mosaic on nutrient transport to coastal waters[J]. Estuaries, 1992,15(4): 431-442.
  • 5Lowrance R, Ahier L S, Newbold J D, et al. Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake Bay watersheds[J]. Environmental Management, 1997, 21(5) : 687-712.
  • 6Mayer P M, Reynolds S K, Mccutchen M D. Meta- Analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2007,36(4): 1172-1180.
  • 7Castelle A J, Johnson A W, Conolly C. Wetland and stream buffer size requirements: A review [J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1994,23(5):878-882.
  • 8Dillaha T A, Reneau R B, Mostaghimi S, et al. Vegeta- tive filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollu- tion control[J]. Transactions, American Society of Ag- ricultural Engineers, 1989,32 (2): 513 519.
  • 9Lee P, Smyth C, Boutin S. Quantitative review of ripar- ian buffer width guide lines from Canada and the United States [J]. Environmental Management, 2004,70 (2) : 165-180.
  • 10Woessner W W. Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought[J]. Ground Water, 2000,38 (3) : 423-429.

二级参考文献93

共引文献234

同被引文献84

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部