期刊文献+

“柯氏模型”在高校课堂教学质量评估中的应用 被引量:4

Application of Kirkpatrick Model in Teaching Quality Assessment for University Classes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "柯氏模型"提出的企业培训有效性评估分为反应层、学习层、行为层及效果层四个层次。将该评估方法和技术经转换应用到高校课堂教学质量评估中是对现有教育测评体系进行创新的有益尝试,特别对于实践性较强的专业而言,有助于实现课堂教学的延伸。 The efficiency assessment of enterprise training provided by Kirkpatrick Model can be divided into four levels recreation,learning,behavior and result. This assessment method and technology can be used in teaching quality assessment for university classes. It is a useful tool for us to realize the extension of class teaching mission,especially for those practical classes teaching.
作者 高园
出处 《鸡西大学学报(综合版)》 2014年第10期24-26,共3页 JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition
关键词 柯氏模型 评估层次 课堂教学质量 Kirkpatrick Model assessment level quality of class teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1李莉.培训效果评估模型解析[J].中国电力教育,2005(4):25-28. 被引量:20
  • 2罗哲,易艳玲.基于CIPP模型和柯式模型构建我国公务员培训评估体系[J].中国行政管理,2007(4):40-42. 被引量:25
  • 3Alkin, M. C. (1980). Uses and users of evaluation. In E.L. Baker(Eel. ), Evaluating federal education programs.
  • 4Bryk, A. S. (Ed.). (1983). Stakeholder - based evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 17. San Francisco, CA:Jossey- Bass.
  • 5Conway, J. A. (1984). The myth, mystery and mastery of participative decision making in education. Educational Administration Quarterly,20(3), 11-40.
  • 6Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization - focused evaluation( 2ndEd. ). Newbury, CA: Sage.
  • 7Cousins, J.B.&Earl,L.M. (1992).The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14 (4),397-418.
  • 8Fetterman, D. M. ( 1994 ). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1-15.
  • 9Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Empowerment evaluation and the Intemet: A synergistic relationship. Current Issues in Education[ On-line], 1 (4)
  • 10Holdaway, E. A. (1986). Making research matter. Alberta Journal of Education, 32(3) ,249-264.

共引文献100

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部