期刊文献+

地佐辛和吗啡用于胆囊切除术后静脉镇痛的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of intravenous dezocine and morphine in postoperative patient of cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较地佐辛和吗啡用于胆囊切除术后静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)的效果及安全性。方法 80例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期在全麻下行胆囊切除术的患者随机分为地佐辛组和吗啡组,进行静脉自控镇痛(PCIA),每组40例。地佐辛组用地佐辛40mg,吗啡组用吗啡40mg,分别以生理盐水加昂丹司琼3mg稀释至100mL,以LCP模式给药。观察术后4、8、16、24h的镇痛评分(VAS)、镇静评分(Ramsay)及不良反应发生情况。结果 2组患者术后各时间点VAS及Ramsay评分差异无显著性(P〉0.05),组间比较差异有显著性(P〈0.01)。地佐辛组出现恶心、呕吐2例,吗啡组出现恶心、呕吐11例,皮肤瘙痒12例。结论地佐辛可安全地用于胆囊切除术后静脉自控镇痛,其镇痛效果与吗啡相当,不良反应发生率明显低于吗啡。 Objective To compare the analgesia efficacy and safety of dezocine and morphine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in postoperative patient of cholecystectomy.Methods 80 cases of ASAⅠ-levelⅡ elective patients with cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into with sheen and morphine group,for self-control analgesia(PCIA),40 cases in each group.To assist symplectic group land with 40 mg,40mg with morphine,morphine group respectively with physiological saline,Dan SiQiong 3mg diluted to 100 mL,the LCP model.To observe the postoperative 4h,8h,16 h,24hof VAS pain score,Ramsay sedation scores,and adverse reactions occur.Results VAS,Ramsay scale and satisfaction scale showed no significant difference between the two groups.The dosage of analgesic consumption within 24 hours was significantly higher in group D than that in group M(P〈0.01).The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in group D than that in group M(P〈0.01).Conclusion Dezocine call be safely administrated to postoperative patient of cholecystectomy undergoing orthopedic surgery via PCIA with equal analgesic efficacy as morphine but fewer adverse reactions.
作者 高洁
出处 《河南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2014年第3期208-210,共3页 Journal of Henan University:Medical Science
关键词 镇痛 地佐辛 吗啡 胆囊切除术 analgesia dezocine morphin cholecystectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘华.镇痛泵在妇产科手术后应用体会[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2007,6(2):117-117. 被引量:5
  • 2Peng WH, Sandler AN. A review of the use of fentanyl analgesia in the management of acute pain in adults. Anesthesiology, 1999,90 (2) :576-599.
  • 3Suliburk J, Hdmer K, Moore F, et al. The gut in systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis. Enzyme systems fighting multiple organ failure. Eur Surg Res, 2008, 40: 184-189.
  • 4Kofoed K, Eugen-Olsen J, Petersen J, et al. Predicting mortality in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome: an evaluation of two prognostic modds, two soluble receptors, and a macrophage migration inhibitory factor, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2008, 27: 375-383.
  • 5Sikora JP, Kuzanski W, Andrzejewska E. Soluble eytokine receptors sTNFR I and sTNFR II, receptor antagonist IL-lra, and anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-13 in the pathogenesis of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in the course of burns in children. Med Sci Monit, 2009, 15: CR26- 31.
  • 6Wan Y, Xu J, Ma D, et al. Postoperative impairment of cognitive function in rats: a possible role for cytokine-mediated inflammation in the hippocampus. Anesthesiology, 2007, 106: 436-443.
  • 7Mahdy AM, Galley HF, Abdel-Wahed MA, et al. Differential modulation of interleukin-6 and interleukin 10 by diclofenac in patients undergoing major surgery. Br J Anaesth, 2002, 88: 797-802.
  • 8Schenk MR, Putzier M, Kugler B, et al. Postoperative analgesia after major spine surgery: patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. Anestb Analg, 2006, 103: 1311-1317.
  • 9Kim JK, Lee SJ, Koo BN, et al. The effect of epidural sufentanil in ropiracaine on uyinary retention in patients undergoing gastrecto- my[ J ]. Br J Anaesth,2006,97 ( 3 ) :414 - 418.
  • 10Grass JA. Patient- controlled analgesia[ J]. Anesth Analg,2005, 101(5 Suppl) :44 -61.

共引文献145

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部