鲁迅、周作人的文学史论异同——《中国小说的历史的变迁》和《中国新文学的源流》比较

A Comparative Study of the Opinions of Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren towards Literary History

鲁迅的《中国小说的历史的变迁》,以史涵论,蕴含着"人"(真人)的评史标准;周作人的《中国新文学的源流》,以论带史,返观"五四"新文化运动,明确了"志"(感情)的评史标准。这两篇讲稿,虽各有治学路数,但都着眼于新文学的"当下"文坛,从不同方向推进"人"的文学史观。

Lu Xun＇s Vicissitudes of Chinese Novels contains his comments in literary history descrip- tion and embodies the standard of ＂human being＂ （real human being） in his commenting; Zhou Zuoren＇s Headstream of Chinese New Literature explicates his comments displaying at once the liter- ary history, reviews the ＂May Fourth New Culture Movement＂ and makes dear the standard of ＂Zhi＂ （sentiment） in commenting history. The two [ectures, though in different academic approaches, both focus on the literary arena of the new literature and advance the humanistic concept of literay history from different directions.