摘要
目的 :探讨醒脑开窍针刺法治疗强迫症的优点。方法 :6 0例强迫症患者随机分为针刺组 32例 ,西药组 2 8例。针刺组采取醒脑开窍针刺法 ,西药组采用氯丙咪嗪 ,治疗 8周 ,观察两组疗效与副反应的比较。结果 :针刺组与西药组总有效率无显著差异 (P >0 0 5 ) ,但针刺组基本无副反应 ,经副反应评定表 (SECL)评分 ,明显优于西药组 (P <0 0 1)。结论
Purpose To explore advantages of needling method for restoring consciousness and inducing resuscitation for treatment of compulsion. Methods 60 cases of compulsion were randomly divided into acupuncture group (32 cases) and western medicine group (28 cases). They were treated respectively with the needling method for restoring consciousness and inducing resuscitation, and chlorpromazine for 8 weeks, and then therapeutic effects and side effects in the both groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups, but the side effect scale showed that the acupuncture did not have basically side effect and was better than the western medicine group in the side effects ( P <0 01). Conclusion Needling method for restoring consciousness and inducing resuscitation has less side effect for treatment of compulsion.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2002年第8期519-520,共2页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
关键词
氯丙咪嗪
治疗
强迫症
疗效
对比观察
针灸疗法
Compulsive Personality Disorder/acup ther
Chlorpromazine/ther use
Consciousness Restor Resuscitat