期刊文献+

农产品检测中如何利用质控数据评定不明确度

Uncertainty evaluation in detection of agricultural products by using quality control data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用质控数据即控制样检测的结果是评定不确定度的方法之一,与传统Bottom-up法相比,该方法不仅包含各种变异因素,还大大简化评定过程,减少计算量。本文探讨了利用质控数据评定不确定度的原理和过程,以及其在农产品中两种重金属检测中的应用。对于使用质控样进行日常监控的实验室来说,利用已经收集的质控数据进行不确定度评定,还可以大大节省单独评定不确定度所需的时间和物力成本。 The measurement of the control samples is an approach for uncertainty evaluation based on the quality control data.Compared with the traditional Bottom-up method,the above one not only includes the variance sources in a laboratory,but also simplifies the evaluation procedures and reduces the calculated amount.The principles and processes of the uncertainty evaluation method,and its ap-plication in agricultural products of two kinds of heavy metals detection are discussed.For the labora-tory using the quality control for daily monitoring,the method of uncertainty evaluation based on the quality control data can reduce the time and cost of a separate evaluation for uncertainty.
作者 王薇 郁琼花
出处 《上海农业学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期107-109,共3页 Acta Agriculturae Shanghai
关键词 农产品质控数据 不确定度 Agricultural product Quality control data Uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T6379.12004测量方法与结果的准确度(正确度与精密度)第1部分总则与定义[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
  • 2International Standards Organization. GUM:Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement[S]. International Organization for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland : 1995.
  • 3郑波,张克荣,李梦龙.化学测量不确定度研究进展[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2007,17(1):184-187. 被引量:16
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T5009.11-2003食品中总砷及无机砷的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003.
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T5009.15-2003食品中镉的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003.

二级参考文献44

  • 1郑波,张克荣,李梦龙,李工兵.Uncertaint Eyasy^(TM):测量不确定度评定的Excel插件[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2005,15(12):1532-1533. 被引量:3
  • 2P van Zoonen,R Hoogerbrugge,SM Gort,et al.Some practical examples of method validation in the analytical laboratory[J].Trends Anal Chem,1999,18(9-10):584 -593.
  • 3CITAC/Eurachem Guide:Guide to Quality in Analytical ChemistryAn Aid to Accreditation,2002.Available from:〈 http://www.Eurachem.bam.de 〉.
  • 4Eurachem/CITAC Guide:Traceability in chemical measurement,A guide to achieving comparable results in chemical measurement,Joint Eurachem/CITAC Working Group on Measurement Uncertainty and Traceability,2003.Available from:〈 http://www.Eurachem.bam.de 〉.
  • 5M Thompson,S Ellison,R Wood.Harmonised guidelines for single laboratory validation of methods of analysis[J].Pure Appl Chem,2002,74(5):835 -855.
  • 6Youden W.Uncertainties in Calibration,Proc.1962 International Conference on Precision.Electromagnetic Measurements,August 1962.
  • 7Taylor B,Kuyatt C.Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results,NIST Technical Note 1297,U.S.Dept.of Commerce,January 1993.
  • 8International Standards Organization,GUM:Guide to the Expressionof Uncertainty in Measurement,ISO,Geneva,Switzerland,1995.
  • 9EURACHEM,Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurements.EURACHEM Secretariat,P.O.Box 46,Teddington,Middlesex TW110LY,UK,1995.
  • 10S.L.R.Ellison,M.Rosslein,A.Williams(Eds.),Eurachem/CITAC Guide:Quantifying Uncertainty in AnalyticalMeasurement,second ed.,2000.Available from:〈 http://www.Eurachem.bam.de 〉.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部