期刊文献+

MR动态增强扫描对早期宫颈癌的诊断及分期价值的研究 被引量:32

Evaluation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Scanning in Making Preoperative Diagnosis and Staging of Cervical Carcinomas
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究MR动态增强扫描在ⅠB~ⅡB期宫颈癌术前分期中的作用。方法对在本院行MR平扫及动态增强扫描后行手术治疗的42例宫颈癌患者MR资料,双盲法进行术前分期,再结合动态增强扫描,绘制时间-信号曲线,并结合病理分期,计算分期的准确率,应用McNemar配对卡方检验统计两者准确率的差异性。结果平扫结合增强图像的术前MR分期准确率为66.7%,常规MR结合动态增强扫描后准确率提高到88%,两者之间的差异具有统计学意义(P=0.035)。结论 MR动态增强扫描早期时相,可以评价早期宫颈癌的浸润范围和宫旁、阴道侵犯程度,提高术前分期的准确性。 Objective To investigate the usefulness of dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) in preop- eratively staging I B - ⅡB uterine cervical carcinoma (UCC). Methods A total of 42 patients with pathologically-con- firmed UCC were enrolled in this study. Both preoperative plain and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were performed in all the patients. Preoperative staging of the tumor was determined by using double blind method, then with the help of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI scanning the time intensity curves (TIC) of region of interest (ROI) in pathological region and nor- mal tissue were drawn. Combined with the pathologic staging results, the accurate rate of tumor staging judged by DCE- MRI was calculated, and the differences in the accurate rate between pathology and DCE-MRI were statistically analyzed by using McNemar paired t test. Results The preoperative MR staging accuracy determined by plain and pre-contrast MR images was 66.7%, while the preoperative MR staging accuracy determined by routine MR and post-contrast MR images was 88.0%. The difference between the two techniques was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion DCE-MR can effectively evaluate the invasion extent and the severity of parauterine and vaginal infiltration of early cervical carcino- ma, thus the preoperative staging accuracy can be improved.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第9期1376-1380,共5页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 宫颈癌 动态增强MRI 分期 Cervical carcinoma Dynamic contrast- enhanced MRI Preoperative Staging
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Corusic A,Skrgatic L,Mahovliv V,et al. Cervical cancer as a public health issue-what next? Coil Antropol,2010,34:301.
  • 2Pecorelli S, Ziqliani L, Odicino F, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet ,2009,105 : 107.
  • 3Togashi K, Morikawa K, Kataoka ML, et al. Cervical cancer. J Mgan Reson Imaging, 1998,8:391.
  • 4BaUeyguier C, Sala E ,Da Cunha T, et al. Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI, guidelines of European Society of Urogenital Radi- ology. Eur Radiol,2011,21:1102.
  • 5Kraljevie Z,Viskovi e K,Ledinsky M,et al. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging ( FIGO ) with histopathology findings. Coil ntropol, 2013,37:561.
  • 6Choi HS, Kim HS, Choi JH, et al. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma results of prospective study. J Comput Assist Tomogr,2004,28:620.
  • 7Shweel MA, Abdel-Gawad EA, Abdelqhany HS, et al. Uterine cervi- cal malignance : Diagnostic accuracy of MRI with histopathologic cor- relation. J Clin Imaging Sci ,2012,2:42.
  • 8Thomeer MG, Gerertein C, Spronk S, et al. Clinical examination ver- sus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervi- cal carcino-ma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol, 2013,23:2005.
  • 9Kunda S, Chopra S, Verma A, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer: current evidence and future directions. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapuetics ,2012,8 : 11.
  • 10Nicolet V,Carigan L,Bourdon F,et al. MR imaging of cervical carci- noma: a practical staging approach. RadioGraphics,2000,20 : 1539.

二级参考文献22

  • 1单军,徐坚民,龚静山,王晓玫,徐宏里,冯晓凤.早期增强MRI对良恶性卵巢肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2003,37(11):1001-1006. 被引量:41
  • 2林开武,张碧清,薛晓玲.宫颈癌的MRI分期与临床及病理分期对照研究[J].医学影像学杂志,2010,20(12):1853-1855. 被引量:35
  • 3林梅,包强,王尔祯,林孟光,严刚,池菊仙,金宇.MR动态增强扫描对宫颈癌的诊断价值初探[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(2):277-280. 被引量:17
  • 4Ozsarlak O, Tjalma W, Schepcns E, et al. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging ( FIGO ) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol, 2003,13:2338-2345.
  • 5Kaur H, Silverman PM, Iyer RB, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of cervical carcinoma. AJR,2003,180:1621-1631.
  • 6Okamoto Y, Tanaka YO, Nishida M, et al. MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging- pathologic correlation. Radiographics, 2003,23:425-445.
  • 7Van Vierzen PB, Massuger LF, Ruys SH, et al. Fast dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma. Clin Radiol, 1998,53:183-192.
  • 8Seki H, Azumi R, Kimura M, et al. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. AJR, 1997, 168 : 1579-1585.
  • 9Aberle DR, Chiles C, Gatsonis C, et al. Imaging and cancer: research strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network. Radiology,2005,235:741-751.
  • 10Nicolet V, Carignan L, Bourdon F, et al. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach. Radiographics, 2000,20 : 1539-1549.

共引文献43

同被引文献223

引证文献32

二级引证文献369

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部