期刊文献+

充填采煤液压支架夯实离顶距影响因素研究 被引量:15

Study of factors influencing the gap between backfill hydraulic support and roof
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用Pro/E5.0三维仿真软件构建了3种常用型号固体充填采煤液压支架的实体模型,基于务实离顶距合理性的判定原理,重点分析了支护高度、煤层倾角、顶板提前下沉量及夯实作用次数等因素对夯实离顶距的影响规律.结果表明:各因素对夯实离顶距均有明显影响,其中支护高度最为显著;影响程度各有区别,不同型号支架适应的工程地质条件也各有不同,以六柱正四连杆支架为例:支护高度为最大设计高度60%~85%、煤层倾角近水平、顶板提前下沉量为0、循环夯实6次以上时,夯实离顶距最易保障充填采煤液压支架的充填性能,且该架型支架适应煤层倾角较小、对充实率要求不高、顶板条件较好的充填工作面. Three types of backfill hydraulic support models are established using Pro/E 5. 0 simulation software. The supporting height, coal seam dip angle, pre-roof subsidence and tam- ping times on roof gap are analyzed based on the judgment principle of rationality roof gap. Re- sults show that all the factors, especially the supporting height, have a significant impact on the value of roof gap, however the degree of influence differs. Different types of backfill hy- draulic support are suitable for different engineering conditions. For six columns and four bar linkage backfill hydraulic support, a best compression ratio can be achieved when supporting height is 60%-85% of the maximum designed height, the coal seam is nearly horizontal, tam- ping times are no less than 6, and pre-roof subsidence is 0. This type of support is suitable for a backfilling coalface with small seam dip, low demanding of compression ratio and good roof conditions.
出处 《中国矿业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期757-764,共8页 Journal of China University of Mining & Technology
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2013CB227905) 江苏省2013年度普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(CXLX13_951) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-11-0728)
关键词 夯实离顶距 充实率 充填采煤液压支架 支护高度 顶板提前下沉量 夯实作用次数 roof gap compression ratio backfill hydraulic support supporting height pre-roof subsidence tamping times
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献93

共引文献660

同被引文献192

引证文献15

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部