期刊文献+

神经松动术对脑卒中恢复期偏瘫患者上肢运动功能的影响 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨神经松动术对脑卒中恢复期偏瘫患者上肢运动功能的影响。方法:将68例患者随机分成治疗组(34例)和对照组(34例)2组。治疗组接受常规康复治疗的同时接受神经松动术治疗,对照组只接受常规治疗,8周为1疗程,治疗前后进行Fugl--Meyer上肢运动功能评定。结果:经8周治疗后,2组的Fugl--Meyer上肢运动功能评分较治疗前明显提高,差异有显著统计学意义(P〈0.01),治疗组较对照组提高更明显,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:2种治疗方案均能改善脑卒中恢复期偏瘫患者的上肢运动功能,二者结合疗效更佳。
作者 金彩君
机构地区 台州市立医院
出处 《中国伤残医学》 2014年第19期151-153,共3页 Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1南登岜.康复医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.158.
  • 2Ostwald SK, Davis S, Hersch G, et al. Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines for Stroke Survivors After Discharge Home [J]. J Neurosci Nuts, 2005, 40(3): 173-191.
  • 3Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, et al. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trim [J]. Lancet, 1999, 354: 191-196.
  • 4PatriciaM,Davies,刘钦刚译.循序渐进·偏瘫患者的全面康复治疗[M].第2版.北京:华夏出版社,2007.365-384.
  • 5Karges J, Smallfied S. A description of the outcomes, frequency, duration, and intensity of occupational, physical, and speech therapy in inpatient stroke rehabilitation [J]. J Allied Health, 2009, 38(1):E1-E10.
  • 6Butler DS, Shacklock MO, Slater H. Treatment of altered nervous system mechanics[M].UK:Livingston Chunchill,1994,693-703.
  • 7各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33029
  • 8Ferraro M, Demaio JH, Krol J, et al. Assessing the motor status score: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after slroke [J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair,2002, 16(3): 283-289.
  • 9闵瑜,吴媛媛,燕铁斌.改良Barthel指数(简体中文版)量表评定脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力的效度和信度研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2008,30(3):185-188. 被引量:814
  • 10苏久龙,潘翠环,叶正茂,沈怡,万新炉.神经松动术对早期脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能的影响[J].国际医药卫生导报,2010,16(13):1571-1573. 被引量:17

二级参考文献40

  • 1柳卫民,郑丽芳,梅元武.脑卒中患者生活质量的评估及其影响因素[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(29):142-144. 被引量:15
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33029
  • 3Shah S,Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel IndeX for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989,42:703-709.
  • 4Eakin P, Baird H. The Community Dependency Index:a standardized assessment of need and measure of outcome for community occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther, 1995,58 : 17-22.
  • 5Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkkuma H, et al. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil, 1997,11 : 28 -35.
  • 6Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The copenhagen strokes study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997,78:161-165.
  • 7Kwon S,Hartzema AG,Duncan PW,et al. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the functional independence measure and the modified Rankin scale. Stroke, 2004, 35: 918-923.
  • 8Dennis W, Pamela W, Sue ML. Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional measure in stroke,the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,55:922-928.
  • 9Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil, 2000,22:702-715.
  • 10Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional independence measure in stroke :the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,5:922-928.

共引文献33729

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部