期刊文献+

论双向度的“诉调对接”机制及其建构 被引量:5

On the Bidirectional Mechanism of Litigation-Mediation Docking and Its Construction
原文传递
导出
摘要 "诉调对接"是近年来人民法院倡导建立的化解社会矛盾纠纷的工作机制。法学界对于"诉调对接"工作机制的界定存在分歧。不论是从字面含义,还是从产生背景,抑或是从实践表现来考察,"诉调对接"都应界定为诉讼和调解的双向度对接。诉讼支持衔接调解的机制包括诉讼费用的激励和惩戒、调解协议程序法效力的确认以及当事人适时审判请求权的赋予;调解为诉讼分流的机制涵盖了调解在司法程序中的转介适用、延伸适用和强制适用等多种扩大调解适用的举措。在世界上一些国家和地区出现的混合程序将诉讼和调解两种特质融为一体,诉调的相互支持、协调和融通达到一个新的高度,值得中国加以借鉴。 "Litigation-mediation docking" is a working mechanism advocated and established in recent years by people's courts to resolve social conflicts and disputes. There exist differences among the jurisprudential circle in defining the working mechanism of " litigation-mediation docking" . Whether from the literal meaning, or from the background, or from the practice to examine its per- formance, "litigation-mediation docking" should be defined as the bidirectional docking between liti- gation and mediation. The mechanism of supporting and connecting mediation with litigation consists of the incentives and disciplinary actions on litigation costs, the confirmation of the effectiveness of the procedural law for the mediation agreement and the entitled right to the parties requesting a time- ly trial. As a mechanism to shunt litigation, mediation covers a variety of measures to expand media- tion application in judicial proceedings, including referral application, extension application and manda- tory application. In some countries and regions around the world, there appears the mixed process that fuses the two special qualities of litigation and mediation together as one, the mutual support, coordi- nation and convergence between litigation and mediation has reached a new height, it is worthwhile for China to learn from them.
作者 李德恩
出处 《江西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期113-121,共9页 Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 江西省社会科学"十二五"规划项目"‘调解优先’司法政策研究--以新<民事诉讼法>实施为视角"(13FX11)
关键词 调解 诉讼 诉调对接 混合程序 mediation litigation litigation-mediation docking hybrid process
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1娄银生,沈明磊.江苏法院“诉调对接”助力和谐[N].人民日报,2006-10-11(14).
  • 2姬文清,任玉峰.“诉调对接”实务问题分析与规制[J].法律适用,2009(8):82-84. 被引量:10
  • 3潘剑锋.民诉法修订背景下对“诉调对接”机制的思考[J].当代法学,2013,27(3):102-111. 被引量:55
  • 4冉井富.警惕经费因素对诉调对接的消极影响[N].中国社会科学报,2009-12-15(07).
  • 5[英]阿德里安·A.s.朱克曼.危机中的民事司法-民事诉讼的比较视角[M].傅郁林,等,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005t128.
  • 6齐树洁.民事司法改革研究[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社.2004.291.
  • 7颐维退.香港调解制度的发展-对2009年香港民事司法改革的初评[A].徐听.司法.第五辑(调解的中国经验专号)[C].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2010:214-215.
  • 8李德恩.法院调解的效力之维[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010,28(6):58-63. 被引量:6
  • 9[澳]娜嘉·亚历山大.全球调解趋势(第二版)[M].王福华,等,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2011:265-266.
  • 10李叶丹.荷兰法院转介调解制度的新发展[A].齐树洁.东南司法评论(2012年卷)[c].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2012:470.

二级参考文献87

同被引文献33

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部