期刊文献+

应用SGS和LHS分析数字土壤质量评价中的不确定性

APPLICATION OF SGS AND LHS TO ANALYZING UNCERTAINTIES IN DIGITAL SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 土壤信息不确定性在空间分析中的传递是数字土壤评价中的关键问题。本文提出使用序贯高斯模拟(Sequential Gaussian simulation,SGS)和拉丁超立方抽样(Latin hypercube sampling,LHS)相结合的方法(即SGS-LHS),来应对该问题,目的在于充分利用SGS和LHS各自的优点,互补各自的缺点,以提高不确定性传递分析的准确性和效率。这种方法(包括两种途径:SGS-LHS1和SGS-LHS2)和SGS、LHS一起被应用于香港农田土壤质量评价中,并进行了比较。结果表明:(1)SGS-LHS分析所得的不确定性结果与SGS接近一致,与LHS则有一定的差别,但差别不大;(2)SGS-LHS估计不确定性的准确性与SGS接近一致,且两者均高于LHS,尽管LHS估计的置信度区间平均宽度略显精确。 Transmission of uncertainty of soil information in spatial analysis is an issue critical to digital soil assessment. To cope with the issue,coupling of the sequential Gaussian simulation( SGS) and the Latin hypercube sampling( LHS) methods,i. e.,SGS-LHS,was proposed with a view to making full use of the advantages of the two methods ascomplementation to overcome their respective drawbacks,so as to improve accuracy and efficiency of the transmission and analysis of the uncertainty. The new method,( including two pathways: SGS-LHS1 and SGS-LHS2),SGS and LHS were tested in soil quality assessment of farmlands in Hong Kong for comparison. Results show that the uncertainty of the analysis using the SGS-LHS method was similar to that using SGS,but different to a certain,rather a big extent from that using LHS,and the combination method was approximate to SGS,but higher than LHS in accuracy,although LHS appeared to a little bit more accurate in terms of mean width of the confidential intervals. Therefore,the combined SGS-LHS method is recommended for analysis of transmission of soil information uncertainty in spatial analysis.
出处 《土壤学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期963-973,共11页 Acta Pedologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41201216) 广西优良用材林资源培育重点实验室开放课题(12A0405) 香港研究资助局(2002-PPR-3)资助
关键词 序贯高斯模拟 拉丁超立方抽样 土壤质量 不确定性 数字土壤评价 Sequential Gaussian simulation Latin hypercube sampling Soil quality Uncertainty Digital soil as-sessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1孙孝林,赵玉国,刘峰,王德彩,梁传平.数字土壤制图及其研究进展[J].土壤通报,2013,44(3):752-759. 被引量:19
  • 2Carr F, McBratney A B, Myar T, et al. Digital soil assess-ments: Beyond DSM. Geoderma, 2007, 142:69--79.
  • 3Malone B P, de Grnijter J J, McBratney A B, et al. Using addi- tional criteria for measuring the quality of predictions and their uncertainties in a digital soil mapping framework. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 2011, 75 : 1032--1043.
  • 4Sun X L, Wu S C, Wang H L, et al. Uncertainty analysis for the evaluation of agricultural soil quality based on digital soil maps. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 2012, 76(4) : 1379-- 1389.
  • 5Brown J D, Heuvelink G B M. Assessing uncertainty propagation through physically based models of soil water flow and solute transport//Anderson M G. Encyclopedia of Hydrologic Sciences. Chichester, UK : Wiley, 2005 : 1181--1195.
  • 6张淑杰,朱阿兴,刘京,杨琳.整合已有土壤样点的数字土壤制图补样方案[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(10):1318-1325. 被引量:8
  • 7Goovaerts P. Geostatistical modeling of uncertainty in soil sci- ence. Geoderma, 2001, 103 : 3--26.
  • 8Qi Y, Darilek J" L, Huang B, et al. Evaluating soil quality indi- ces in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoder- ma, 2009, 149 : 325--334.
  • 9Castrignano A, Buttafuoco G, Canu A,et al. Modelling spatial uncertainty of soil erodibility factor using joint stochastic simula- tion. Land Degradation & Development, 2008, 19 (2): 198--213.
  • 10Minasney B, Sulaeman Y, McBratney A B. Is soil carbon disap- pearing? The dynamics of soil organic carbon in Java. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(5) : 1917--1924.

二级参考文献83

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部