期刊文献+

基于质量屋与排序组织法的产品概念决策方法 被引量:5

Product Design Alternative Selection:an Integrated Approach with HOQ and PROMETHEE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了在选择概念设计方案时实现顾客需求与专家经验知识的协调决策,提出基于质量屋与排序组织法的产品概念决策方法。通过模糊质量屋的关联矩阵与自相关矩阵进行顾客需求向产品技术特征的转换,将概念方案决策矩阵建立于质量屋的输出结果之后,利用所输出的技术特征权重值进行模糊排序组织法的综合排序,排序组织法所使用的偏好函数由专家根据产品的技术特点构造。以实例说明了所提方法的可行性和有效性。 In order to select conceptual design schemes through coordination between customer re-quirements and experience knowledge ,an integrated approach combining HOQ and PROMETHEE was proposed .The correlation matrix and autocorrelation matrix of fuzzy HOQ were utilized to realize the transformation from customer requirements to technical characteristics .The conceptual decision matrix was established after the HOQ outputs to use the fuzzy weights of technical characteristics to conduct comprehensive ranking of fuzzy PROMETHEE ,where preference functions were constructed according to expert knowledge .A case study shows the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method .
机构地区 西南交通大学
出处 《中国机械工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第18期2496-2500,共5页 China Mechanical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51278429) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(10501B10096015) 西南交通大学峨眉校区高层次人才经费专项(10501X10096013)
关键词 概念决策 质量功能配置 质量屋 排序组织法 HOUSE of QUALITY (HOQ ) design alternative selection quality function deployment preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation(PROMETHEE) method
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1乌尔里克,埃平格.产品设计与开发[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
  • 2Paul G, Beitz W. Engineering Design[M]. London: The Design Council, 1984.
  • 3Yeo S H, Mak M W, Balon S A P. Analysis of De- cision-making Methodologies for Desirability Score of Conceptual Design [J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2004, 15(2): 195-208.
  • 4Ayag Z. An Intergrated Approach to Evaluating Conceptual Design Alternatives in a New Develop- ment Environment[J]. International Journal of Pro- duction Research, 2005, 43(4): 687-713.
  • 5王美清,唐晓青.产品设计中的用户需求与产品质量特征映射方法研究[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(5):136-140. 被引量:74
  • 6车阿大,杨明顺.质量功能配置理论及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2008.
  • 7杨明顺,林志航.QFD中顾客需求重要度确定的一种方法[J].管理科学学报,2003,6(5):65-71. 被引量:64
  • 8Liu H T. Product Design and Selection Using Fuzzy QFD and Fuzzy MCDM Approaches [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35: 482-496.
  • 9Kimita K, Shimomura Y, Arai T. Evaluation of Customer Satisfaction for PSS Design[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2009, 20(5): 654-673.
  • 10Chen L H, Ko W C. A Fuzzy Nonlinear Model for Quality Function Deployment Considering Kano's Coneept[J]. Mathemathical & Computer Model ing, 2008, 48(3/4): 581-593.

二级参考文献26

  • 1罗小明,杨惠鹄.灰色综合评判模型[J].系统工程与电子技术,1994,16(9):18-26. 被引量:56
  • 2李世国.产品交互设计[M].南京:江苏美术出版社,2008.
  • 3Sullivan L P. Quality function[J]. Quality Progress, 1986, 19(6) : 39--50.
  • 4Guinta L R, Pfizler N C. The QFD Book: The Team Approach to Solving Problems and Satisfying Customers through Quality Function Deployment[M]. New York: Amacom, 1993.
  • 5Lai K Chan, Ming L. Wu. Prioritizing the technical measures in quality function deployment[J]. Quality Engineering. 1998, 10(3) : 467--469.
  • 6Wasserman G. On how to prioritize design requirements during QFD process[J], liE Transactions, 1993, 25(3) : 59--65.
  • 7Wang J. Fuzzy outranking approach to priofitize design requirements in quality function deployment[ J]. International Journal of Production Research, 1999, 37(4) : 899--916.
  • 8Armacost R L, Componation P J, MuUens M A. AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: An industrialized housing application[J]. IIE Transaction, 1994, 26(4): 72--79.
  • 9Fiorenzo Franceschini, Sergio Rossetto. Design for quality: Selecting a product's technical features[ J]. Quality Engineering, 1997,9(4) : 681--688.
  • 10Temponi Cecelaia, Yen John, Tiao W Amos. House of quality: A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 117(8): 340--354.

共引文献125

同被引文献62

  • 1侯智,陈世平.基于Kano模型的用户需求重要度调整方法研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(12):1785-1789. 被引量:81
  • 2王静,李华.基于模糊逻辑推理的新产品开发方案决策方法[J].工业工程,2006,9(2):111-115. 被引量:2
  • 3崔勇,孙枫.基于模糊群决策的质量屋方案选择模型[J].中国机械工程,2007,18(7):807-811. 被引量:13
  • 4孙昭旭,韩敏.不完全信息下的群体多属性决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(7):1098-1101. 被引量:23
  • 5廖平,王建录.基于遗传算法的机械零件形位误差评定[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2012.
  • 6JIN Jian, JI Ping, LIU Ying,el at. Translating online customer opinions into engineering characteristics in QFD: a probabilistic language analysis approach [ J ] Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,2015,41: 115-127. 1301: 10. 1016/j. en- gappai. 2015.02. 006.
  • 7CHEN L H, KO W C. Fuzzy linear programming models for NPD using a four-phase QFD activity process based on the means-end chain concept[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010,201 (2) : 619-632.
  • 8KWONG C K, YE Y, CHEN Y, et al. A novel fuzzy group decision-making approach to prioritizing engineering character- istics in QFD under uncertainties[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2011,49(19) :5801-5820.
  • 9CHEN Longsheng, LIN Zueeheng, CHANG ]ingrong. FIR : an effective scheme for extracting useful metadata from social media[J]. Journal of Medical Systems,2015,39(11) :139.
  • 10WILLIAMS P, NAUMANN E. Customer satisfaction and bus-iness performanee:a firm-level analysis[J]. Journal of Services Marketing,2011,25(1) :20-32.

引证文献5

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部