摘要
为了适应北京地区西瓜生产需求,根据本地西瓜生产特点,引进4个日本优质小果型西瓜品种与‘京秀’开展品种对比研究。结果表明:‘CX11’综合生长指标较均衡,植株高度、叶面积和茎粗度分别为211 cm、394 cm2和9.44 mm,植株整体长势‘CX21-1’>‘CX21’>‘CX11’>‘L555’>‘京秀’。各品种商品果率均在95%~97%区间内,极易坐果。‘CX21-1’、‘L555’和‘CX11’单位面积产量表现较好,667 m2分别达到3091、3037、3011 kg,3品种间差异不显著。果皮厚度‘CX21’最薄,仅为0.46 cm,‘L555’最厚为0.72 cm。可溶性固形物含量‘L555’最高,中心和边部分别为11.74%和9.78%,各品种间差异均不显著,整体水平较优异。‘CX11’口感最优,口感酥脆,纤维含量极少。综合比较发现,’CX11’和’L555’在产量和品种方面表现优异,适合作为本地区高产优质新品种进行大面积推广;‘CX21-1’可用作市场批发。‘京秀’和‘CX21’由于产量不佳,不适宜在本地区早春大棚生产。
In order to meet the needs of watermelon production in Beijing area, we tested the Japanese small fruit watermel-on varieties under local cultivation. The results showed that:the growth of‘CX11’was relatively balanced. Its plant height, leaf area and stem diameter were 211 cm,394 cm2 and 9.44 mm,respectively. The order of the growth potential was‘CX21-1’>‘CX21’>‘CX11’>‘L555’>Jingxiu. The marketable yield of the varieties were 95%-97%and they were easy for set-ting fruit. The yield of‘CX21-1’‘L555’and‘CX11’reached to 3 091 kg per 667 m2,3 037 kg per 667 m2 and 3 037 kg per 667 m2,respectively. The skin thickness of‘CX21’is only 0.46 cm,L555’has the highest soluble solids content in cen-ter and edge,11.74% and 9.78% respectively. CX11’and‘L555’performed better in terms of yield and are suitable for large scale trial.‘CX21-1 can be produced for wholesale market. Jingxiu and‘CX21’are not suitable for production in ear-ly spring greenhouse in this area.
出处
《中国瓜菜》
CAS
2014年第5期49-51,54,共4页
China Cucurbits And Vegetables
基金
西甜瓜产业技术体系北京市创新团队资金项目
关键词
小果型西瓜
品种比较
大棚栽培
Small fruit watermelon
Comparative experiment
Greenhouse