当代美国智障教育课程的发展述评被引量：5

A Commentary on the Curriculum for Mentally Retarded Children in the US

导出

摘要智障教育的课程经历了补偿模式、发展模式、功能模式和环境生态模式的变革。在融合教育理念和课程改革的影响下,当代美国智障教育课程努力在基于标准的课程和功能性课程间寻找平衡,以满足智障儿童学术性和功能性的发展目标。但儿童发展的需求是多方面的,没有任何一种课程模式是完美的,智障儿童的课程内容应该建立在如何对儿童发展有利的基础之上,帮助学生实现毕业后的发展。运用通用设计的原则,将标准课程和功能性课程相结合,加上相关人员多方合作,利于推进智障课程发展。 The curriculum for mentally retarded children has experienced the reforms in such models of remedy,development,functions and environmental ecology. Under the influence of inclusive education and the curriculum reform,the contemporary curriculum for mentally retarded children in the US is trying to seek balance between the standards-based curriculum and the functional curriculum so as to achieve the academic and functional objectives. But children have diversified demands for development,and no curriculum model is perfect; therefore,the curriculum for mentally retarded children should be based on how to benefit child development to help them to be successful after graduation. This requires the use of the principle of universal design,the combination of the standards-based curriculum and the functional curriculum,and the assistance from relevant personnel.

作者汪斯斯邓猛

机构地区北京师范大学教育学部南京特殊教育职业技术学院

出处《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期20-25,共6页 Chinese Journal of Special Education

关键词智障儿童融合标准课程功能性课程 children with mental retardation inclusive education standards-based curriculum functional curriculum

分类号 G764 [文化科学—特殊教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献34

1Patton J R,Polloway E A.Curricular orientations.In G.A.Robinson,J.R.Patton,E.A.Polloway (Eds.),Best practices in mild mental disabilities.Reston,VA:Division Mental Retardation,Council for Exceptional Children,1989.28-35.
2Dymond S K,Orelove F P.What constitutes effective curricula for students with severe disabihties? Exceptionality,2001,9(3):109-122.
3Wehmeyer M L.Beyond access:ensuring progress in the general education curriculum for students with severe disabilities.Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabihties,2006,31(4):322-326.
4褚华,姜美玲.透视美国基于标准的课程改革[J].宁夏教育,2003(10):50-51. 被引量：3
5Wehmeyer M L,Lattin D L,Lapp-Rincker G,et al.Access to the general curriculum of middle school students with mental retardation:an observational study.Remedial and Special Education,2003,24(5):262-272.
6Turnbull H R,Turnbull A,Wehmeyer M L,et al.A quality of life framework for special education outcomes.Remedial and Special Education,2003,24(2):67-74.
7Wehrneyer M L,Lattin D L,Agran M.Achieving access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation.Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,2001,36(4),327-342.
8Nietupski J,Hamr-Nietupski S,Curtin S,et al.A review of curricular research in severe disabilities from 1976 to 1995 in six selected journals.The Journal of Special Education,1997,31:36-55.
9Shurr J,Bouck E C.Research on curriculum for students with moderate and severe intellectual disability:a systematic review.Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities,2013,48(1):76-87.
10Agran M,Alper S,Wehmeyer M.Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities:what it means to teachers.Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,2002,37(2):123-133.