期刊文献+

基于营养风险筛查的快速康复外科在食管癌围术期的应用 被引量:7

Application of fast-track surgery in the management of nutritional risk on patients with esophageal carcinoma after esophagectomy perioperatively
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨基于营养风险筛查(NRS)的快速康复外科(FTS)模式在食管癌患者围术期治疗中的临床应用.方法 选取2008年1月至2013年12月本院同期住院食管鳞癌适合手术治疗的患者170例,随机分为两组(n=85):研究组术前采用营养风险筛查2002 (NRS2002)方法进行评估并予以干预性治疗(FTS组);对照组按传统围术期方法治疗(CPM组).观察两组患者术后首次排气、首次排便时间、拔除胸腔引流管时间、住院时间以及手术并发症等情况.结果 两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).与CPM组比较,FTS组术后首次排气时间[(59.01±2.73)h比(90.16±2.82)h]、首次排便时间[(3.35±1.37)d比(4.78±1.74)d]、拔除胸腔引流管时间[(2.76±0.34)d比(4.39±0.25)d]、术后住院时间[(8.16±0.80)d比(10.93±1.39)d]以及总并发症发生率[7.06% (6/85)比20.00% (17/85)]均显著减少,差异有统计学意义(x2=7.42,均P<0.05).结论 应用基于营养风险筛查的FTS治疗模式,可有效促进食管癌患者术后的康复,减少术后并发症发生率,缩短住院时间,从而改善患者的临床结局. Objective To evaluate the influence of fast-track surgery in perioperative period on the clinical outcomes of patients at nutritional risk in respectable esophageal cancer surgery perioperatively.Methods A total of 170 esophageal carcinoma patients receiving radical operation in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2013 were randomly divided into two groups by simple random method (n =85 each):one group was treated with the new concept of FTS-based on nutritional risk screening (FTS group),and the other control group received conventional perioperative management (CPM group).The postoperative first passage of flatus and defecation,time to drainage tube removal,postoperative hospital stay,and morbidity of the postoperative complication were recorded and compared.Results The time to drainage tube removal and length of postoperative hospital stay were significantly lower in the FTS group than those in the CPM group,and the overall postoperative complication rate was 7.06% (6/85) in the FTS group and 20.00% (17/85) in the CPM group (all P 〈0.05).In FTS group,the first flatus time was (59.01 ±2.73) h,the first defecation time was (3.35 ± 1.37) d,removing time of chest tube was (2.76 ±0.34) d,and postoperative hospital days was (8.16 ± 0.80) d; in the control group,they were (90.16 ±2.82) h,(4.78 ± 1.74) d,(4.39 ±0.25) d,and (10.93 ± 1.39) d respectively,showing significant differences (all P 〈0.05).The operative time was similar between these two groups.Conclusion The new concept of FTS by nutrition risk screening and intervention apparently can accelerate recovery after esophagngastrectomy,reduce the rate of overall complications,promote bowel function recovery,and decrease morbidity in the perioperative period for patients with esophageal carcinoma.
出处 《中华临床营养杂志》 CAS CSCD 2014年第4期204-208,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition
关键词 食管肿瘤 围术期 营养风险筛查 快速康复外科 Esophageal neoplasms Perioperative Nutritional risk screening Fast-track surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Olsén MF,Wennberg E.Fast-track concepts in major open upper abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery:a review[J].World J Surg,2011,35 (12):2586-2593.
  • 2Malone DL,Genuit T,Tracy JK,et al.Surgical site infections:reanalysis of risk factors[J].J Surg Res,2002,103 (1):89-95.
  • 3Johansen N,Kondrup J,Plum LM,et al.Effect of nutritional support on clinical outcome in patients at nutritional risk[J].Clin Nutr,2004,23 (4):539-550.
  • 4Correia MI,Caiaffa WT,da Silva AL,et al.Risk factors for malnutrition in patients undergoing gastroenterological and hernia surgery:an analysis of 374 patients[J].Nutr Hosp,2001,16 (2):59-64.
  • 5Fearon KC,Ljungqvist O,Von Meyenfeldt M,et al.Enhanced recovery after surgery:a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection[J].Clin Nutr,2005,24 (3):466-477.
  • 6Lassen K,Soop M,Nygren J,et al.Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery:Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations[J].Arch Surg,2009,144 (10):961-969.
  • 7Varadhan KK,Neal KR,Dejong CH,et al.The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Clin Nutr,2010,29 (4):434-440.
  • 8Kehlet H,Wilmore DW.Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery[J].Ann Surg,2008,248 (2):189-198.
  • 9中华医学会.临床诊疗指南:肠外肠内营养学分册(2008版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:1-10,16-20.
  • 10Braga M,Ljungqvist O,Soeters P,et al.ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition:surgery[J].Clin Nutr,2009,28 (4):378-386.

二级参考文献88

  • 1陈伟,蒋朱明,张永梅,王秀荣,陈春明,史轶蘩.欧洲营养不良风险调查方法在中国住院患者的临床可行性研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):137-141. 被引量:216
  • 2August DA, Huhmann MB. A. S. P. E. N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support therapy during adult anticancer treatment and in hematopoietic cell transplantation [ J ]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2009, 33(5):472-500.
  • 3Bozzetti F, Arends J, Lundholm K, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: non-surgical oncology[ J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28(4) :445 -454.
  • 4Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition : surgery[ J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28 (4) :378 - 386.
  • 5Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition : Surgery including organ transplantation[J]. Clin Nutr, 2006, 25(2) :224 -244.
  • 6Arends J, Bodoky G, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition : Non-surgical oncology [J]. Clin Nutr, 2006, 25 (2) :245 -259.
  • 7Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12(5) :489 -495.
  • 8Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status [J]. J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 1987, 11(2): 8-13.
  • 9Guigoz Y. The mini nutritional assessment ( MNA ) review of the literature-What does it tell us [ J]. J Nutr Health Aging, 2006, 10(6) :466 -485.
  • 10Stratton RJ, King CL, Stroud MA, et al. Malnutrition universal screening tool predicts mortality and length of hospital stay in acutely ill elderly [J]. Br J Nutr, 2006, 95 ( 15 ) :325 - 330.

共引文献325

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部