期刊文献+

品牌资产构建:基于企业社会责任还是企业能力? 被引量:10

Building Brand Equity:Based on Corporate Social Responsibility or Corporate Competence?
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文依据线索利用理论、品牌次级联想理论以及品牌价值链理论等相关理论,以消费者所熟悉的生产快速消费品、耐用消费品和高科技产品的跨国公司为测试对象,探讨了企业社会责任和企业能力两类企业联想对消费者视角和产品市场产出视角的品牌资产的影响。研究结果表明,这两类企业联想都是影响品牌资产的重要因素,并且它们的影响具有普遍性和行业差异性——在快速消费品行业和耐用消费品行业,企业社会责任对品牌资产的影响要大于企业能力的影响;而在高科技行业,企业能力对品牌资产的影响要大于企业社会责任的影响。本研究为企业基于企业社会责任和企业能力提升品牌资产提供了理论依据。 Based on related theories such as clue utilization theory, brand secondary association theory and brand chain theory, this paper regards familiar multi-national corporations producing fastmoving consumer goods, durable consumer goods and high-tech products as the study objects, and discusses the effects of two types of corporate associations, namely corporate social responsibility and corporate competence, on brand equity from the perspectives of consumer and product market output. It shows that the two types of corporate associations are important factors influencing brand equity, and their effects are featured by universality and industry differences, namely in fast-moving and durable consumer goods industries, corporate social responsibility has stronger effect on brand equity than corporate competence, but in high-tech industry, corporate competence has stronger effect on brand equity than corporate social responsibility. This paper provides theoretical basis for the improvement of brand equity in accordance with corporate social responsibility and corporate competence.
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期22-32,共11页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 国家社会科学基金"本土代工企业自创国际品牌:路径依赖与能力突破研究"(批准号:11BGL010) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金"参照群体对消费者奢侈品感知价值和品牌态度影响的跨文化比较研究"(批准号:12YJC630060)
关键词 企业联想 企业社会责任 企业能力 品牌资产 corporate association corporate social responsibility corporate competence brandequity
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Aaker D A and Keller K L. Consumer evaluations of brand extensions[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1990,54(1) :27-41.
  • 2Aaker D A Building strong brands[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1996.
  • 3Ahluwali Rand Gurhan-Canli Z. The effects of extensions on the family brand name: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2000, 27(12) :371-381.
  • 4Anderson J C and Gerbing D W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach[J]. Psychology Bulletin, 1988,103(3) : 411-423.
  • 5Berens G, van Riel C B Wand van Bruggen G H. Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The mode-rating role of corporate brand dominance[J]. Journal of Marke-ting, 2005,69(3) : 35-48.
  • 6Biehal G J and Sheinin D A The influence of corporate messages on the product portfolio[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2007 , 71(4): 12- 25.
  • 7Bigne-Alcaniz Es Curras-Perez R,Ruiz-Mafe C and Sanz-Blas S. Cause-related marketing influence on consumer responses: The moderating effect of cause-brand fit[J].Journal of Marketing Communications, 2012, 18(4) : 265- 283.
  • 8Brown T J and Dacin P A The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1997 , 61 (1) : 68-84.
  • 9Carrol A B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders[J]. Business Horizons, 1991, 34(4): 39-48.
  • 10Chaudhuri A and Holbrook M B. The effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand 10yalty[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2001, 65(1): 81-93.

二级参考文献138

共引文献556

同被引文献103

引证文献10

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部