期刊文献+

汉语本族语者与英语本族语者思考时间的方式——对思维—语言关系的实证研究 被引量:12

Conceptualization of Time by Chinese and English Speakers: An Empirical Study of Thought-Language Relationship
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究考察了汉语本族语者和英语本族语者对于时间的认知方式。结果显示,绝大多数汉语本族语者(约80%)和英语本族语者非常相似,都倾向于以水平轴线思考时间。只有相对少数汉语本族语者(约20%)倾向于以垂直轴线表征时间,该汉语群体在认知时间的方式上和英语本族语者有明显不同。研究结果进一步说明,语言(时空隐喻)可能并不是塑造时间思维的决定性因素。本研究为探索思维—语言关系提供了一些启示。 This empirical study observes the representations of time by Chinese and English speakers. Results show that most Chinese speakers ( around 80% ) are identical to English speakers with regard to their salient horizontal bias for temporal cog- nition. Only around 20% of Chinese speakers, who overwhelmingly rely on vertical axis to reason about time, may be discrepant from English speakers. The evidence suggests that language (spatiotemporal metaphor) may not be the critical factor that shapes people' s temporal cognition. Implications for theoretical and empirical issues concerning language-thought relation are also discussed.
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期45-49,共5页 Foreign Language Education
基金 国家留学基金项目"国家建设高水平大学公派出国留学项目"(项目编号:201206530013)的阶段性成果
关键词 时间 空间 英语 汉语 思维方式 time space English Chinese thought
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bonato, M. , Zorzi, M. & Umilta, C. When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line[ J]. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 20!2 (10) : 2257-2273.
  • 2Boroditsky, L. Does Language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time[ J]. Cognitive Psychology, 2001 ( 1 ) : 1-22.
  • 3Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O. & McCormick, K. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? [ J]. Cognition, 2011(1) : 123-129.
  • 4Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. Time in the mind: Using space to think about time[J]. Cognition, 2008(2) : 579-593.
  • 5Chen, J. -Y. Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differ- ently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001) [ J ]. Cognition, 2007 (2) : 427-436.
  • 6Chen, J. -Y. & O' Seaghdha, P. G. Do Mandarin and English speak- ers think about time differently? Review of existing evidence and some new data[ J]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2013 (2) : 338-358.
  • 7Fuhrman, O. & Boroditsky, L. Cross-cuhural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task [J]. Cognitive Science,2010(34) : 1430-1451.
  • 8Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S. & Boroditsky, L. How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3 D [ J ]. Cognitive Science, 2011 (7) : 1305-1328.
  • 9January, D. & Kako, E. Re-evaluating evidence for the linguistic rel- ativity hypothesis : Response to Boroditsky ( 2001 ) [ J ]. Cognition, 2007(2) : 417-426.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar ( Vol I) : Theo- retical Prerequisites [ M ]. Beijing: Beijing University Press, 2004.

同被引文献95

引证文献12

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部