期刊文献+

自然流产患者绒毛与复发性流产患者胚胎植入前遗传学筛查微阵列比较基因组杂交结果对比分析 被引量:4

Comparative Analysis by aCGH in Patients with Spontaneous Abortion Villus and PGS Embryos with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨植入前遗传学筛查(PGS)降低复发性流产(RSA)患者早期流产率的可能原因及临床意义。方法:通过微阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH)检测,统计自然流产(SA)患者绒毛染色体非整倍性异常高发核型,分析该高发核型在RSA患者胚胎中的发生几率。结果:SA患者绒毛中16、X、15号3条染色体的非整倍性占绒毛染色体非整倍性异常的52.27%;在RSA患者胚胎中,该3条染色体非整倍性占胚胎染色体非整倍性异常的50.50%。结论:SA患者绒毛染色体异常类型相对集中,具有明显的高发核型;RSA患者胚胎染色体非整倍性高发核型与流产绒毛相一致,提示对RSA患者行PGS助孕,可规避染色体异常胚胎的着床,从而降低早期流产率。 Objective: To investigate the possible mechanism and clinical worth of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in reducing early abortion rate in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA). Methods: By the microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) detection, the aneuploidy karyotypes which had the high frequency appeared in the villus from patients with spontaneous abortion (SA) were explored. And then, the occurrence probability of these aneuploidy karyotypes in embryos from patients with RSA were detected. Results: The percent of villus with aneuploidy of 16, X or 15 was 52.27% in all aneuploidy anomalies villus from the patients with SA. And the percent of such aneuploidy was 50.50% in all aneuploidy anomalies embryos from the patients with RSA. Conclusion: The abnormal chromosome types which appear with high frequency in villus from the patients with SA also present a high frequency in embryos from the patients with RSA. It suggests that applying PGS in RSA patients is helpful to avoid implantation of chromosome abnormality embryos and reduce the early abortion rate.
出处 《生殖与避孕》 CAS CSCD 2014年第9期714-717,共4页 Reproduction and Contraception
关键词 植入前遗传学筛查(PGS) 微阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH) 复发性流产(RSA) 自然流产(SA) 染色体非整倍性 preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) spontaneous abortion (SA) aneuploidy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Ljunger E,Stavreus-Evers A,Cnattingius S,et al.Ultrasonographic findings in spontaneous miscarriage:relation to euploidy and aneuploidy.Fertil Steril,2011,95(1):221-4.
  • 2Petracchi F,Colaci DS,Igarzabal L,et al.Cytogenetic analysis of first trimester pregnancy loss.Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2009,104(3):243-4.
  • 3Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss.Fertil Steril,2008,90(Suppl):S60.
  • 4Hodes-Wertz B,Grifo J,Ghadir S,et al.Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos.Fertil Steril,2012,98(3):675-80.
  • 5Musters AM,Repping S,Korevaar JC,et al.Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation genetic screening or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage a systematic review of the best available evidence.Fertil Steril,2011,95(6):2153-7.e3.
  • 6Sulliva N,Crosignani PG.Genetic aspects of female reproduction.Hum Reprod Update,2008,14(4):293-307.
  • 7吴彤华,尹彪,朱元昌,李观贵,林奇,伍慧丽,曾勇,彭月婷,宋成.辅助生殖和自然妊娠中早期自然流产胚胎染色体数目异常的研究[J].生殖与避孕,2013,33(10):658-664. 被引量:13
  • 8Lathi RB,Westphal LM,Milki AA.Aneuploidy in the miscarriages of infertile women and the potential benefit of preimplanation genetic diagnosis.Fertil Steril,2008,89(2):353-7.
  • 9王珺,张靖,黄剑磊,李丽,马夜肥,张亨德,王晓红.微阵列比较基因组杂交胚胎植入前遗传学筛查技术在复发性流产患者中的应用研究[J].生殖与避孕,2014,34(2):121-125. 被引量:5
  • 10Barbash-Hazan S,Frumkin T,Malcov M,et al.Preimplantation aneuploid embryos undergo self-correction in correlation with their developmental potential.Fertil Steril,2009,92(3):890-6.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Petracchi F, Colaci DS, lgarzabal L, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of first trimester pregnancy loss. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 104(3):243-4.
  • 2Schouten JP, McElgtmn C J, Waaijer R, et al. Relative quan- tification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation- dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res, 2002, 30 (12):e57-69.
  • 3Kooper A J, Faas BH, Kaler-Baats E, et al. Multiplex ligation- dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a stand-alone test for rapid aneuploidy detection in arnniotic fluid cells. Prenat Diagn, 2008, 28(11):1004-10.
  • 4Bettio D, Venci A, Levi Setti PE. Chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages after different assisted reproduction procedures. Placenta, 2008, 29(Suppl B): 126-8.
  • 5Simpson JL. Causes of fetal wastage. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 50(1):10-30.
  • 6Diego-Alvarez D, de Alba MR, Cardero-Merlo R, et al. MLPA as a screening method of aneuploidy and unbalanced chro- mosomal rearrangements in spontaneous miscarriages. Prenat Diagn, 2007, 27(8):765-71.
  • 7Kjaergaard S, Sundberg K, JCrgensen FS, et al. Diagnostic yield by supplementing prenatal metaphase karyotyping with MLPA for microdeletion syndromes and subtelomere imbalances. Prenat Diagn, 2010, 30(10):995-9.
  • 8Xu YW, Peng YT, Wang B, et al. High follicle-stimulating hormone increases aneuploidy in human oocytes matured in vitro. Fertil Steril, 2011, 95(1):99-104.
  • 9Dursun P, Gultekin M, Yuce K, et al. What is the underlying cause of aneuploidy associated with in creasing maternal age? Is it associated with elevated levels of gonadotropins? Medical Hypotheses, 2006, 66(1):143-7.
  • 10Bingol B, Abike F, Gedikbasi A, et al. Comparison of chromosomal abnormality rates in ICSI for non-male factor and spontaneous conception. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2012, 29(1):25-30.

共引文献16

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部