期刊文献+

脊柱转移性肿瘤外科治疗生存质量分析 被引量:1

The spine metastatic tumor surgery survival quality analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析脊柱转移性肿瘤经外科治疗后生存质量的变化情况。方法收集我院2011年7月-2013年7月诊治的脊柱转移性肿瘤患者35例作为研究对象,所有患者均经外科治疗,分析患者治疗前后的生存治疗改变情况。结果研究结果显示,本组35例患者中仅有1例发生肺功能衰竭死亡,其余34例患者均未出现严重并发症,通过对患者实施为期3个月的随访发现,患者的疼痛程度、神经功能、食欲、不良情绪、睡眠质量等均得到了明显的改善,且与术前比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论脊柱转移性肿瘤经外科治疗具有良好的临床疗效,能有效促进患者的生存质量改善,值得在临床应用上推广。 Objective To explore the changes of the quality of life of spinal metastatic tumors after surgical treatment. Methods Collected 35 patients with spinal metastatic tumors from July 2011 to July 2013 during the diagnosis and treatment as the study object, all patients received surgical treatment and analysis changes on the survival before and after treatment therapy. Results Results show that there was only one in the 35 patients occurred pulmonary function failure death, the rest of the 34 patients without serious complications occurred, implementing a three-month follow-up to the patients found that patients' pain degree, nerve function, appetite, bad mood, sleep quality, etc were obviously improved, and it has differences statistically significant(P〈0.05) between preoperative. Conclusion Spinal metastatic tumors after surgical treatment has good clinical effect, can effectively promote the patient's quality of life, is worth popularizing in clinical application.
出处 《中国医药科学》 2014年第19期162-163,166,共3页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 脊柱转移性肿瘤 外科治疗 生存质量 Spinal metastatic tumors Surgical treatment Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献36

  • 1李熙雷,董健.脊柱转移性肿瘤的外科治疗[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(16):4618-4620. 被引量:8
  • 2邹学农,Anders Grejs,李海声,Kristian Hφy,Ebbe S Hansen,Cody Bünger.预期寿命估计对脊柱转移瘤手术选择与预后预测的临床意义[J].癌症,2006,25(11):1406-1410. 被引量:18
  • 3[1]Wise JJ, Fischgrund JS, Herkowts,HN.et al.Complication,survival rates and risk factors of surgery for metastastic disease of the spine[J]. Spine, 1999,24:1943-1951.
  • 4[3]Healey JH,Brown HK.Complications of bone metastases:surgical management [J]. Cancer,2000,88(12S):2940-2951.
  • 5Choi D, Crockard A, Bunger C, et al. Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group [J]. Eur Spine J,2010,19(2) :215 -222.
  • 6Fehlings MG,David KS,Vialle L,et al. Decision making in the surgical treatment of cervical spine metastases[ J]. Spine,2009,34(22 Suppl) :S108 - S117.
  • 7Polly DW Jr, Chou D, Sembrano JN, et al. An analysis of decision making and treatment in thoracolumbar metastases [ J]. Spine, 2009,34(22 Suppl) :S118 - S127.
  • 8Tokuhashi Y, Ajiro Y, Umezawa N. Outcome of treatment for spinal metastases using scoring system for preoperative evaluation of prognosis[ J]. Spine,2009,34( 1 ) :69 -73.
  • 9Leithner A,Radl R,Gruber G,et al. Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases [ J ]. Eur Spine J ,2008,17 ( 11 ) : 1488 - 1495.
  • 10Hu Y, Xia Q ,Ji J, et al. One-stage combined posterior and anterior approaches for excising thoracolumbar and lumbar tumors : surgical and oncological outcomes [ J ].Spine, 2010, 35 ( 5 ) : 590 - 595.

共引文献20

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部