期刊文献+

组织中多元认同的研究述评 被引量:1

A Research Review on Multiple Identifications in Organizations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于认同"焦点"的差异,组织中的个体对不同实体存在着相互联系的多元认同,对多元认同的研究已成为组织管理研究领域的热点。文章从多元认同的形成、分类、前因、结果、关系等方面对以往研究文献进行了整理和归纳,并在此基础上对未来的研究方向进行展望,指出学者们应该更加关注多元认同的组合和多元认同之间的协调与转化问题。 The individual in the organization may be of interrelated multiple identifications on different entities due to the differ-ences of the“focus”of identification. The study on multiple identifications is a hotspot in the field of organizational manage-ment. The paper sorts out and sums up the previous research literatures from the perspective of the formation, the classifica-tion,antecedent,the result and the relationship of multiple identifications. Based on the study,the paper prospects the direc-tions for the future research,and recommends that scholars should pay more attention to the combination of multiple identifica-tions and the coordination and transformation between them.
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2014年第11期150-154,共5页 East China Economic Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71102156 71102155) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(14LZUJBWYJ033)
关键词 组织 多元认同 综述 organization multiple identifications review
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1宝贡敏,徐碧祥.组织认同理论研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(1):39-45. 被引量:135
  • 2Becker T E. Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making? [J]. Academy of Review, 1992, 35 (1) : 232-244.
  • 3Cohen A. Multiple commitments in the workplace: An integrative approach[M]. Mahwah,NJ: Erlbaum,2003.
  • 4莫申江,王重鸣.国外双重认同研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理,2011,33(10):52-57. 被引量:10
  • 5Tajfel H. Social Categorization, Social Identity and Social Comparison [C]// Tajfel H. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, 1978: 61-76.
  • 6Brewer M B, Gardner W. Who Is This "We"? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996,71 (1): 83-93.
  • 7Turner J C. Some Current Issues in Research on Social Identity and Self-categorization Theories [C]// Ellemers N, Spears R Doosje B. Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1999:6-34.
  • 8Ashforth B E, Mael F. Social Identity Theory and the Organiza- tion [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14 (1) : 20-39.
  • 9Brickson S L. Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link between Organizational Identity and Organizations' Relations with Stakeholders [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2005,50(4): 576-609.
  • 10Flynn F 1. Identity Orientations and Forms of Social Exchange in Organizations [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005 , 30( 4) ,737-750.

二级参考文献34

  • 1宝贡敏,徐碧祥.组织认同理论研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(1):39-45. 被引量:135
  • 2Vora,D,and Kostova,T. A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2007,28 (3) : 327-- 350.
  • 3Richter, A W, West, M A, van Dick, R, and Dawson, J F. Boundary spanners ' identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006,49 (6):1 252-- 1 269.
  • 4Ashforth,B E,Harrison,S H,and Corley,K G. Identification in organizations:An examination of four fundamental questions[J]. Journal of Management,2008,34(3) :325--375.
  • 5Pratt, M,and Foreman, P. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2000,25(1): 18--42.
  • 6Ashforth, B E, and Mael, F. Social identity theory and the organization[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989,14 (1) : 20-39.
  • 7Mael,F,and Ashforth,B E. Alumni and their alma mater;A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1992,13 (2) : 103-- 123.
  • 8Riketta,M. Organizational identification..A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2005,66(2) :358--384.
  • 9Bartels,J,Pruyn,A,de Jong,M,and Jourstra,I. Multiple organizational identification levels and the impact of perceived external prestige and communication climate[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2007,28(2) :173--190.
  • 10Cooper,D,and Thatcher,S M B. Identification in organizations:The role of self-concept orientations and identification motives [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2010,35 (4): 516-- 538.

共引文献143

同被引文献50

  • 1段锦云,王重鸣,钟建安.大五和组织公平感对进谏行为的影响研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):19-22. 被引量:84
  • 2Mowbray P K,Wilkinson A,Tse H H M. An Integrative Re- view of Employee Voice : Identifying a Common Conceptual- ization and Research Agenda [J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2015,17 (3) : 382-400.
  • 3Morrison E W. Employee voice and silence [J]. Annual Re- view of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behav- ior, 2014, 1(1) : 173-197.
  • 4Milliken F J, Morrison E W, Hewlin P F. An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues That Employees Don' t Communicate Upward and Why [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003,40 (6) : 1453-1476.
  • 5LePine J A, Van Dyne L. Predicting Voice Behavior in Work Groups [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83 (6) : 853-868.
  • 6Lavelle J J. What Motivates OCB? Insights from the Vol- unteerism Literature [J]. Journal of Organizational Behav- ior,2010,31 (6) :918-923.
  • 7Ng T W, Feldman D C. Employee Voice Behavior: A Meta- Analytic Test of the Conservation of Resources Framework [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012,33 (2) : 216-234.
  • 8Liang J, Farh C I, Farh J-L. Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice:A Two-Wave Examination [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012,55 ( 1 ) : 71-92.
  • 9Morrison E W. Employee Voice and Silence [J]. The Annu- al Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2014( 1 ) : 173-197.
  • 10Mead G H. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of A Social Behaviorist [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago press, 2009.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部