农业TTB与宏观经济因素被引量：1

TTB in Agriculture and Macro-economic Factors

导出

摘要 TTB(临时性贸易壁垒)作为WTO许可的贸易救济措施,目前正在全球范围各个国家、产业以不同方式增长。文章运用1989—2012年全球农业TTB的HS8分位产品层面数据,在考虑贸易伙伴双边关系的国家对固定效应及随时间而变的共同系统性因素基础上,本文对农业TTB与宏观经济变量的关系进行了研究,发现农业作为一个具有特殊属性的产业,其TTB从总体样本来看基本类似工业具有反周期特征,但影响的程度有差异,而发展中国家样本体现出更多异质性特征,本文是从存量角度的进行研究,考虑到未来农业TTB可能的增量,后续研究势在必行。 Based on 1989- 2012 agriculture data at level of HS 8 - digit, tile article studied relations between TTB in agriculture and macroeconomic factors with country pairwise fixed effects and time trend. The results show as a industry with unique features, TTB in agriculture shares the similar feature of anti- business cycle and effects at a different extent. However, regression in developing countries sample indicated more hetero- plasmy. In view of this paper focusing mainly in current situation, the possible increasing TTB in agriculture may need more research followed.

作者王晰

机构地区湖南农业大学商学院

出处《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期72-82,共11页 Finance & Economics

基金教育部人文社科项目"农产品反倾销的异质性及形成机理研究"(13YJC790148) 湖南省自然科学基金项目(13JJ4064)

关键词农业TTB 宏观经济因素工业 TTB in Agriculture Macroeconomic Factors Manufacturing Industry

分类号 F741.2 [经济管理—国际贸易] F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1R.Mirus(2002). A review of anti- dumping determinations of agricultural products in the North American Free Trade Agreement. Working paper, Western Centre for Economic Research School of Business, University of Alberta.
2B. A. Blonigen. Food Fight: Antidumping Activity in Agricultural Goods. International Conference Paper. Capri (Italy), 2004 (6): 23-26.
3K. M. Reynolds (2006). Dumping on Agriculture: Are 31aere Biases in Antidmnping Regulations?. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT, Vol. 3, Issue 2: 135- 153.
4R. R Barichello, N. Malhotra (2008). Anti- Dumping, Agriculture, and the Level of Development. Ssm working paper, Available at SSRN: http: //ssm. corn/abstract = 1260378.
5F. Ashe -(2001). Testing the effect of an anti - dumping duty: The US salmon market. Empirical Economics, Vol. 26, issue2, 2001 (5).
6Stmamer, Barichello and Paggi. Economic Analysis in Disputes over Trade Ronedy and Related Measux in Agri- culture, with Examples from Recent Cases. Intemational Conference paper: Agricultural policy reform and the WTO, where are we heading?. Capri(Italy), 2003 (6): 23-26.
7K. Baylis, N. Malhotra (2008). Anti - Dumping and Market Power in the Agriculture Sector, With a Special Case Study of Fresh Tomatoes Industry. The Estey Centre Journal of International Iaw and Trade Policy. Vol. 9, issue 1.
8K. Baylis, N. Malhotra and H. Plus (2009). The Effect of Antidumping in Agriculture: A Cross- Border Comparison. working paper, available at http: //works. bepress, ccmvZhms/1/.
9C. A. Carter and C. G. Trant. U. S. trade remedy law and agriculture: trade diversion and investigation ef- fects. Canadian Journal of Economics, 2010, 43 (2).
10N. M. Duc (2010). Application of econometric models for price impact assessment of antidumping measm'es and labelling laws on global markets: a case study of Vietnamese striped catfish. Reviews in Aquaculture, Vol. 2, issue 2. pp 86- 101.

二级参考文献45

1于斌.勇敢应对从长计议——由我国虾产品遭美反倾销调查引起的思考[J].中国水产,2004(3):12-14. 被引量：2
2胡麦秀,严明义.反倾销保护引致的市场转移效应分析——基于中国彩电出口的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2005(10):19-23. 被引量：14
3鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):71-84. 被引量：146
4Blonigen, Bruce A., Evolving Discretionary Practices of U.S. Antidumping Activity. NBER Working Paper No. 9625. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003a.
5Blonigen, Bruce A., Food Fight." Antidamping Activityin Agricultural Goods. Invited paper presented at the International Conference Agricultural policy reform and the WTO: where are we heading? Capri (Italy), June 23- 26, 2003b.
6Jorge Miranda, Raul A. Tones, and Mario Ruiz, "The International Use of Antidumping" , Journal of World Trade,1998, 32(5):5-71.
7Thomas J. Prusa, "On the Spread and Impact of Anti-dumping" , Canadian Journal of Economics, 2001, .34(3):591-611.
8Bruce A. Blonigen, Evolving Discretionary Practices of U.S. Antidumping Activity. NBER Working Paper No. 9625. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003a.
9Robert M.Feinberg and Kara M. Olson, Tadff Liberalization and Increased Administrative Is There a Quid Pro Quo ? Working Paper, 2005.
10James C. Hartigan, "Is the GATT/WTO Biased Against Agricultural Products in Unfair International Trade Investigations? " Review oflnternadonal Economics, 2000, 8(4):634-646.