期刊文献+

自传式民族志:概念、实施与特点 被引量:12

AUTO- ETHNOGRAPHY: CONCEPTS,METHODS AND CHARACTERISTICS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 上世纪60年代以来,民族志的传统研究模式遭遇种种诟病。受建构主义哲学思潮的影响,一些民族志者在研究方法上做出了个性化的尝试。自传体民族志作为一种新的民族志研究方法,日益受到学术界的关注。本文通过梳理国外近期相关论述,努力呈现这一新兴研究方法的相关概念、实施步骤及其特点。 The traditional approaches of ethnographic study have been criticized since the 1960s. Influenced by the constructivist philosophical thought, some ethnographers have made personalized attempts in research methods. Auto -ethnography, a new method in ethnographic study, has increasingly drawn attentions from the academic circle. By reviewing the recent related materials both at home and abroad, this article intends to present the concepts, implementation steps, and characteristics concerning this new research method.
作者 杨爽 钟志勇
出处 《广西民族研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期58-63,共6页 GUANGXI ETHNIC STUDIES
关键词 自传式民族志 质性研究 auto - ethnography qualitative research
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Ellis, C. , & Bochner, A. P. Autoethnography, personal narrative, and personal reflexivity[ G]//N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd ed. ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000.
  • 2Reed -Danahay, D. E: Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social[ M]. New York: Oxford, 1997.
  • 3蒋逸民.自我民族志:质性研究方法的新探索[J].浙江社会科学,2011(4):11-18. 被引量:75
  • 4Clandinin, D.J. , & Connelly, F. M. Narrative inquiry. Experience and story in qualitative research[ M]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey - Bass, 2000.
  • 5nurse' s experience [J] . International journal of qualitative methods, 2005 (4) .
  • 6Rodriguez, N. , & Ryave, A. Systematic self - observation [ M ] . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
  • 7Schensul, J. J. , & Lecompte, M. D. Essential ethnographic methods. Observations, interviews, and questionnaires [ M ] . Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira, 1999.
  • 8Van Maanen, J. Tales of the field. On writing ethnography [ M] . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
  • 9Nash, R. J. Spirituality, ethics, religion, and teaching. A professor's journey [ MJ . New York: Peter Lang, 2002.
  • 10Florio - Ruane, S. Teacher education and the cultural imagination [ M ] . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.

二级参考文献46

  • 1[美]艾利丝和博克纳:《作为主体的研究者:自我的民族志、个体叙事、自反性》,载[美]邓津和林肯:《定性研究(第3卷):经验资料收集与分析的方法》,风笑天等译,重庆大学出版社2007年版,第777-822页.
  • 2[美]劳伦斯·纽曼:《社会研究方法:定性和定量的取向(第五版)》,郝大海译,中国人民大学出版社2007年版,第114~115页.
  • 3Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membershiproles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 4Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). ReflexiveMethodologies : Interpretation and Research. London, Sage.
  • 5Atkinson, P. (1997). Narrative turn in a blind al-ley? Qualitative Health Research ,7:325 -344.
  • 6Bochner, A. P. (2001). Narrative's virtues. Quali-tative Inquiry, 7(2), 131 - 157.
  • 7Bochner, A. P. & Ellis, C. S. (2006). Communi-cation as Autoethnography. In G. J. Sheperd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.). Communication as Perspectives on Theory. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage, pp. 110- 122.
  • 8Boehner, A. P. , Ellis, C. , & Tillmann- Healy,L. (1997). Relationships as stories, in S. Duck (ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and in- terventions (2nd ed. ). New York: John Wiley, pp. 307 - 324.
  • 9Boehner, A. P. , Ellis, C. , & Tillmann -Healy,L. (1998). Mucking around looking for truth. In B. M. Montgomery & L. A. Baxter ( Eds. ). Dialectical approach to studying personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erl- baum, pp. 41- 62.
  • 10Bruce, T. (2000) Never let the bastards see youcry, Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 69-74.

同被引文献159

引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部