期刊文献+

升压药对感染性休克患者血流动力学及生存质量的影响研究 被引量:5

Effect of vasopressor on hemodynamics and quality of life in patients with septic shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨多巴胺(DA )和去甲肾上腺素(NA)对感染性休克患者血流动力学和生存率的影响。方法采用多中心随机对照研究,选取278例感染性休克患者,分别应用D A和N A进行干预治疗,比较药物应用后不同时点两组患者心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心排指数( CI)、体循环阻力指数(SVRI )变化和6 h乳酸清除率、28 d生存率。结果治疗6 h后平均早期乳酸清除率DA 组患者为22.3%,明显低于 NA 组患者的59.0%, SVO2≥65%的患者分别占30.9%和64.0%,DA组高乳酸清除和SVO2≥65%的患者均明显少于NA组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后各指标值表现出不同的时间效应差异,NA 组1~48 h时 HR均较DA 组低,24~48 h时MAP较DA组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组间CI各时点差异均无统计学意义,NA 组SVRI值在1~48 h时均较DA组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者病死率比较,差异无统计学意义。结论 NA较DA能更好的维持血流动力学稳定,增加脏器灌注,并能有效清除血乳酸,NA在感染性休克中的应用更为安全有效。 OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect on hemodynamics and quality of life in patients with septic shock treated with dopamine (DA) vs. norepinephrine (NA). METHODS The multicenter randomized controlled study was conducted. Totally 278 patients with septic shock respectively received the intervening treatment with DA and NA, the heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) at lh(T1), 4h(T2), 8h(T3), 16h(T4), 24h(T5), 48h (T6) and lactate clearance rate, creatinine clearance rate at 6h after the drug use, and 28 d survival rate in two groups of patients were compared. RESULTS The average lactate clearance rate at 6hafter treatment was 22. 3% in DA group, significant lower than 59. 0% in NA group. There were 30. 9% and 64. 0% of patients who had SVO2 ≥ 65% in DA and NA groups. The number of patients with the average lactate clearance rate and SVO2 ≥ 65% in DA group was significantly lower than those in the NA group (P〈0. 05). Each indicator showed different time effects after treatment as HR in NA group was lower than that in DA group at 1 - 48h and MAP in NA group was higher than in DA group at 24-48h, with statistical significance (P〈0. 05). There were no statistically significant differences in CI between the two groups at each time point. SVRI was significantly higher in the NA group than in the DA group at 1-48h(P〈0. 05). There were no significant differences in mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION NA can maintain hemodynamic stability, increase organ perfusion, and can effectively remove blood lactate than DA, NA is a safe and effective medicine in septic shock.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第20期4999-5001,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 山东省自然科学基金资助项目(NOZR2011CM027) 山东省医药卫生科技基金资助项目(2011HW051)
关键词 多巴胺 去甲肾上腺素 感染性休克 血流动力学 病死率 Dopamine Norepinephrine Septic shock Hemodynamic Mortality
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y, et al. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival inhuman septic shock[J]. Chest, 2009,136(5) : 1237-1248.
  • 2Masip J,Mesquida J, Loengo C,et al. Near-infrared spectros- copy StO2 monitoring to assess the therapeutic effect of dro- trecogin alfa (activated) on microcirculation in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock[J]. Ann Intensive Care,2013,3 (1):30.
  • 3De Backer D,Biston P,Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopa- mine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock[J]. N Engl J Med,2010,362(9): 779-789.
  • 4Vasu TS,Cavallazzi R, Hirani A,et al. Norepinephrine or do- pamine for septic shock: systematic review of randomized clin- ical trials[J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2012,27 (3) : 172-178.
  • 5黄顺伟,金慧,管向东.多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素在脓毒性休克中应用的研究进展[J].医学综述,2011,17(11):1698-1700. 被引量:7
  • 6颜默磊,严静,虞意华,陈进,蔡国龙.多巴胺及去甲肾上腺素对脓毒性休克患者微循环的影响[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2013,18(5):565-569. 被引量:13

二级参考文献34

  • 1Hollenberg SM.Vasopressor support in septic shock[J].Chest,2007,11(132):1678-1687.
  • 2Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Carlet JM,et al.Surviving sepsis campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2008[J].Crit Care Med,2008,36(1):296-327.
  • 3Guérin JP,Levraut J,Samat-Long C,et al.Effects of dopamine and norepinephrine on systemic and hepatosplanchnic hemodynamics,oxygen exchange and energy balance in vasoplegic septic patients[J].Shock,2005,23(1):18-24.
  • 4Sakr Y,Reinhart K,Vincent JL,et al.Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study.[J].Crit Care Med,2006,34(3):589-597.
  • 5Martin C,Viviand X,Leone M,et al.Effect of norepinephrine on the outcome of septic shock[J].Crit Care Med,2000,28(8):2758-2765.
  • 6Patel GP,Grahe JS,Sperry M,et al.Efficacy and safety of dopamine versus norepinephrine in the management of septic shock[J].Shock,2010,33(4):375-380.
  • 7Goldberg LI.Dopamine-clinical uses of an endogenous catecholamine[J].N Engl J Med,1974,291(14):707-710.
  • 8Debaveye YA,Van den Berghe GH.Is there still a place for dopamine in the modern intensive care unit?[J].Anesth Analg,2004,98(2):461-468.
  • 9Kellum JA,Decker J.Use of dopamine in acute renal failure:a meta-analysis[J].Crit Care Med,2001,29(8):1526-16531.
  • 10Giantomasso D,Morimatsu H,May CN,et al.Increasing renal blood flow:low-dose dopamine or medium-dose norepinephrine[J].Chest,2004,125(6):2260-2267.

共引文献16

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部