中西刑法思想史中的共同犯罪问题探源

Joint Crime in Intellectual History of China and the West

对于当前我国刑法学界关于中国共犯体系属于正犯、共犯区分制,单一制,还是双层区分制的争论,不能仅仅局限于类比我国刑法与欧洲大陆各国刑法条文,而应该从各自的传统出发寻求根源。中国共犯体系源于中国传统律例"共犯罪分首从"的罪刑均衡价值,而欧洲大陆各国刑法共犯体系是在罪刑法定原则的逻辑前提下推演出来的,这背后是秩序性思维与规范性思维的不同。可见,中国刑法学界关于中国共犯体系归属的争论正是秩序性思维与规范性思维碰撞的结果。

For China＇s complicity system,academic circles have three opinion ：distinguish principal offender and accomplice system,double distinguish system and only principaloffender system. Chinese complicity system cannot match with western country＇s accomplice system,because the joint-crime classification is completely different in Chinese and western county. Civil law theory of accomplice is reasoning strictly follow Nulla poena sine lege,with the rigorous logic,and the paradox cannot be solved,which generated in continental Europe countries for some reasons,the feudalism,without Unified penalty power are the reasons. At the background of unification in our country,the value of legal system is to pursue matching of crime and penalty. Behind this difference are collision of two kinds of logic,two modes of thinking,the deductive logic and sorting logic,standardization thinking collisions with order thinking.