期刊文献+

剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的微创手术方式探讨 被引量:9

Discussion on minimally invasive surgical methods of uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:寻找适合剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室的微创手术治疗方式。方法:分析2011年1月~2013年1月55例因剖宫产憩室接受微创手术治疗的患者,研究组行腹腔镜辅助下经阴道剖宫产切口憩室修补术,对照组行宫腔镜下治疗剖宫产切口憩室,比较两组患者手术效果及安全性。结果:研究组与对照组患者的手术有效率分别为96.55%、69.23%,术后月经平均缩短分别为6.46天、4.49天,术后并发症发生率分别为3.45%、34.62%,研究组较对照组手术有效率高,术后月经缩短天数多,并发症发生率低(P〈0.05);研究组与对照组患者的平均手术费用分别为8 139.83元、6 236.13元,手术时间分别为48.78 min、78.23 min,对照组较研究组费用低,手术时间短(P〈0.05)。结论:虽然宫腔镜下治疗剖宫产切口憩室快速、价低,但手术效果较差,风险高;腹腔镜辅助下经阴道修补剖宫产切口憩室治疗效果好,安全性高,是一种适合剖宫产切口憩室治疗的微创手术方式。 Objective: To find suitable methods for minimally invasive surgery of uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean sec- tion. Methods : Fifty - five patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery of uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section from Janu- ary 2011 to January 2013 were analyzed, the patients in study group were treated with laparoscopic - assisted transvaginal cesarean section incision diverticulum repair, while the patients in control group were treated with cesarean section incision diverticulum repair under hysteroscope ; the surgical results and safeties in the two groups were compared. Results : The effective rates of operation in study group and control group were 96. 55% and 69. 23% , respectively; the average menstrual times after operation in study group and control group were 6. 46 days and 4.49 days, respectively; the incidence rates of postoperative complications in study group and control group were 3.45% and 34. 62%, respectively ; there were statistically significant differences in the effective rate of operation, the average menstrual time and the incidence rate of postoperative complications between study group and control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . The average operation fees in study group and control group were 8 139. 83 Yuan and 6 236. 13 Yuan, respectively; the average operation times were 48.78 minutes and 78.23 minutes, respec- tively, there were statistically significant differences between study group and control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . Conclusion: Cesarean section incision diverticulum repair under hysteroscope is fast and the price is low, but the efficacy is poor and the risk is high ; the efficacy of laparoscopic - assisted transvaginal cesarean section incision diverticulum repair is good, and the safety is high, which is a minimally invasive surgical method for treatment of uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第30期5004-5006,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 江西省卫生厅项目〔编号20143002〕
关键词 剖宫产 切口憩室 经阴道手术 腹腔镜 Cesarean section Incision diverticulum Transvaginal operation Laparoscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Surapaneni K,Silberzweig JE.Cesarean section scar diverticulum:appearance on hysterosal pingography[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2008,190(4):870-874.
  • 2Fabres C,Aviles G,De La Jara C,et al.The cesarean delivery scar pouch:clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy[J].J Ultrasound Med,2003,22(7):695-700.
  • 3Yazicioglu HF,Sevket O,Ekin M,et al.Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section:is it preventable by intraoperative digital dilatation of the internal cervical ostium?[J].Gynecol Obstet Invest,2012,74(2):131-135.
  • 4Talamonte VH,Lippi UG,Lopes RG,et al.Hysteroscopic findings in patients with post-menstrual spotting with prior cesarean section[J].Einstein(Sao Paulo),2012,10(1):53-56.
  • 5Marotta ML,Donnez J,Squifflet J,et al.Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in nonprognant women[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2013,20(3):386-391.
  • 6Chang Y,Tsai EM,Long CY,et al.Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with post menstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,200(4):370 .e1-370.e4.
  • 7Klemm P,Koehler C,Mangler M,et al.Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound[J].J Perinat Med,2005,33(4):324-331.
  • 8Luo L,Niu G,Wang Q,et al.Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2012,19(4):454-458.

同被引文献86

  • 1冯淑英,陈立斌,黄利娟,梁玉萍,陈湘云,杨冬梓.剖宫产切口宫壁缺损的宫腔镜诊断(附48例分析)[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(7):755-758. 被引量:20
  • 2张琴芳,张英,王会凤,杨梅丽.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统对女性生殖激素水平的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(11):774-775. 被引量:26
  • 3Keymer E. Dehiscence of old hysterectomy scar [ J ]. Bol Soc Chil Obstet Ginecol,1955,20(4) :87-90.
  • 4文迎春,李影,董生伟.子宫憩室妊娠一例[J].佳木斯医学院学报,1993,16(4):31.
  • 5赵新民,黄生传,纪秀杰.温淑芳B超诊断妊娠子宫假性憩室1例[J].中国超声医学杂志,1995,11(1):322.
  • 6Fabres C, Arriagada P, Fernondez C, et al. Surgical treat- ment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleed- ing due to cesarean section scar defect [ J 1. J Minim In- vasive Gynecol,2005, 12(1 ) :25-28.
  • 7Surapaneni K, Silberzweig JE. Cesarean section scar diver- ticu-lum : appearance on hysterosal pingography [ J ]. Am J Roent-genol,2008,190 (4) :870-874.
  • 8Vikharevaosser O, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High preva- lence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound ex-amination [ J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009,34(2) :90-97.
  • 9Ossdr OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. Cesarean section scar ~defects :agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement [ Ji. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco1,2010,35 ( 1 ) :75-83.
  • 10Lin YH, Hwang JL, Scow KM. Endometrial ablation as ~t trea'tment for postmenstrual bleeding due t:o cesarean scar defect[J]. Int J Gynaecol ObStet,2010,111 ( l ) : 88-89.

引证文献9

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部