期刊文献+

基于逻辑框架法的农业科技项目效益实现路径分析 被引量:2

Analysis on Achieving Pathway for Benefit on Agricultural Science and Technology Projects (ASTP) Based on Logical Framework Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借鉴逻辑框架模型,深入分析农业科技项目效益产生的机理和路径,实证研究表明:农业科技投入与科技成果、科技推广和农业经济有正相关关系,农业科技投入虽然对农业经济有一定的直接影响作用,但主要是通过科技成果和科技推广间接作用于农业经济,且具有较强的影响作用。因此,在进行农业科技项目效益评价时,不能以简单的输入/输出方法来进行评估,应该采用"理论驱动"法对农业科技项目预期的关系链进行全面分析和评估,促进农业科技项目和科技推广项目有机结合,提高农业科技项目的效益。 The mechanism and pathway of achieving benefit on ASTP is analyzed deeply based on the logical framework model. Then the empirical studies shows that the inputs (research investment) have positive correlation with outputs (research achievement), extension and outcomes (changes in productivity). Although the inputs have a certain influence on agricultural economics, it mainly affects indirectly agricultural development by research achievements and extension. Therefore, the benefits on ASTP should not be evaluated according by inputs/outputs methods. The anticipated chain of cause/effect relationships of ASTP shall be analyzed and assessed based on the program "theory-driven" approach. It can promote agricultural research and extension projects to integrated closely, at the same time the benefit on ASTP can be improved greatly.
出处 《科技与经济》 2014年第5期39-43,共5页 Science & Technology and Economy
关键词 农业科技项目 效益 路径分析 逻辑框架 agricultural science and technology projects benefit pathway analysis logical framework approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Colin Thirtle, Lin Lin, Jenifer piesse. The impact of research-led agricultural productivity growth on poverty reduction in Africa [J]. Asia and Latin America. World Development. 2003.31 (12) : 1959-1975.
  • 2胡瑞法,时宽玉,崔永伟,黄季焜.中国农业科研投资变化及其与国际比较[J].中国软科学,2007(2):53-58. 被引量:52
  • 3赵芝俊,张社梅.我国农业科研投资宏观经济效益分析[J].农业技术经济,2005(6):41-47. 被引量:34
  • 4Alston J,Pardey P. Making Science Pay: the Economics of Agri- cultural R&D Policy [ M ]. Washington DC : American EnterpriseInstitute Press, 1996.
  • 5Alston J, Norton G, Pardey P. Sciences under Scarcity : Principle and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting [ M ]. Ithaca : Cornell University Press : 1995.
  • 6Jock R Anderson, Gershon Feder. Agricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard Realities [ J ]. The World Band Research Observer,2004(19) : 41-50.
  • 7Andreas Springer-Heinzea, Frank Hartwich, J Simon Henderson, etc. Impact pathway analysis: an approach to strengthening the impact orientation of agricultural research [ J ]. Agricultural Sys- tems,2003 (78) :267-285.
  • 8Garforth C ,Usher R. Promotion and uptake pathways for research output: a review of analytical frameworks and communication channels[J]. Agricultural Systems,1997(55),301-322.
  • 9EIARD. Impact assessment and evaluation in agricultural re- search for development [ J ]. Agricultural Systems,2003 (78) : 329-336.
  • 10Sheng Gen Fan. Research Investment and the Economic Returns To Chinese Agricultural Research [J]. Journal of Productivity A- nalysis,2000(14) : 163-182.

二级参考文献48

共引文献107

同被引文献12

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部