期刊文献+

Fertigation with Wastewater and Vermicompost: Soil Biochemical and Agronomic Implications 被引量:2

Fertigation with Wastewater and Vermicompost: Soil Biochemical and Agronomic Implications
原文传递
导出
摘要 To study how wastewater(WW) and different organic sources(humic substances or vermicompost) affected soil chemical and biochemical fertility and agronomic productivity in field-grown melon, an experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted with the following treatments: three different mixtures of irrigation water(100% WW, 50% WW with 50% groundwater, and 100% groundwater) and, for each WW treatment, four different organic fertilization treatments of control without organic matter application(CK), vermicompost used as surface mulch(SM), vermicompost incorporated into the soil(VC),and humic substances extracted by vermicompost(HS). Chemical and biochemical results indicated an improvement in soil fertility,suggested by the increase in soil organic carbon and nutrient(nitrate and macro- and microelements) contents and in soil microbial activities(hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes), in particular in the VC treatments. In addition, even soil potential metabolism was stimulated by WW combined with organic treatments, as highlighted by the increase in the metabolic(dehydrogenase activity/watersoluble carbon) and nitrification indices(NO-3and NH+4). Melon productivity confirmed these results, with the highest yield and melon quality in the VC treatments irrigated with 100% WW. In conclusion, the combined use of WW and organic amendment,recovering both mineral and organic nutrients from these kinds of recycled materials, was effective in the improvement of soil quality and crop productivity. To study how wastewater(WW) and different organic sources(humic substances or vermicompost) affected soil chemical and biochemical fertility and agronomic productivity in field-grown melon, an experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted with the following treatments: three different mixtures of irrigation water(100% WW, 50% WW with 50% groundwater, and 100% groundwater) and, for each WW treatment, four different organic fertilization treatments of control without organic matter application(CK), vermicompost used as surface mulch(SM), vermicompost incorporated into the soil(VC),and humic substances extracted by vermicompost(HS). Chemical and biochemical results indicated an improvement in soil fertility,suggested by the increase in soil organic carbon and nutrient(nitrate and macro- and microelements) contents and in soil microbial activities(hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes), in particular in the VC treatments. In addition, even soil potential metabolism was stimulated by WW combined with organic treatments, as highlighted by the increase in the metabolic(dehydrogenase activity/watersoluble carbon) and nitrification indices(NO-3and NH+4). Melon productivity confirmed these results, with the highest yield and melon quality in the VC treatments irrigated with 100% WW. In conclusion, the combined use of WW and organic amendment,recovering both mineral and organic nutrients from these kinds of recycled materials, was effective in the improvement of soil quality and crop productivity.
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第5期625-634,共10页 土壤圈(英文版)
基金 Supported by the Azienda Agricola"Amerini Giampiero"and"Campeggio Orizzonte",Livorno,Italy
关键词 土壤化学 施肥处理 蚯蚓粪 农艺 生化 土壤有机碳 污水 随机区组设计 Cucumis melo,enzyme activity,humic substance,organic matter,soil quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2001. Standard Guidelines for Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. ASCE, New York, USA.
  • 2Atiyeh, R. M., Lee, S., Edwards, C. A., Arancon, N. Q. and Metzger, J. D. 2002. The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresource Teehnol. 84: 7-14.
  • 3Ayuso, M., Hernandez, T. and Garcia, C. 1996. Effect of humic fractions from urban wastes and other more evolved organic materials on seed germination. J. Sci. Food Agr. 72: 461- 468.
  • 4Bandick, A. K. and Dick, R. P. 1999. Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31: 1471-1479.
  • 5Benitez, E., Nogales, R., Elvira, C., Masciandaro, G. and Cec- canti, B. 1999. Enzyme activities as indicators of the stabi- lization of sewage sludges composting with Eisenia foetida. Bioresource Technol. 67: 297-303.
  • 6Camp, C. R., Lamm, F. R., Evans, R. G. and Phene, C. J. 2000. Subsurface drip irrigation: past, present and future. In Evans, R. G., Benham, B. L. and Trooien, T. P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Decennial Irrigation Symposium. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Saint Joseph, MI, USA. pp. 363-372.
  • 7Ceccanti, B., Doni, S., Macci, C., Cercignani, G. and Masci- andaro, G. 2008. Characterization of stable humic-enzyme complexes of different soil ecosystems through analytical iso- electric focussing technique (IEF). Soil Biol. Biochem. 40: 2174-2177.
  • 8Ceccanti, B., Pezzarossa, B., Gallardo-Lancho, F. J. and Masci- andaro, G. 1994. Bio-tests as markers of soil utilization and fertility. Geomicrobiol. J. 11: 309-316.
  • 9European Union. 2000. The European Water Framework Directi- ve (2000/60/EC)--Integratcd river basin management for Europe. Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/environme- nt/water/water-framework/index_en.html (verified on June 18, 2014).
  • 10Eyheraguibel, B., Silvestre, J. and Morard, P. 2008. Effects of humic substances derived from organic waste enhancement on the growth and mineral nutrition of maize. Bioresource Technol. 99: 4206-4212.

同被引文献35

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部