期刊文献+

创可贴纱块双压法在经桡动脉介入后穿刺部位加压止血的效果观察 被引量:3

Observation of band-aid joint Gauze piece of Dual pressure method in compression hemostasis for puncture point after transradial coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨创可贴纱块双压法在经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗后穿刺局部创口加压止血的效果。方法选择心血管内科100例经桡动脉行冠心病介入治疗的患者,按住院先后分为对照组和观察组,各50例。对照组患者在经桡动脉行冠心病介入拔鞘管后穿刺部位采用桡动脉介入穿刺部位止血器压迫止血的方法,观察组患者采用创可贴联合纱块双压法进行加压止血的方法。观察比较两组患者在按压止血时间、渗血、淤血、肢端肿胀等情况。结果两组平均持续加压止血时间观察组明显短于对照组,在渗血、淤血、肢端肿胀方面的发生率明显低于对照组,两组比较有明显差异性(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论采用创可贴联合纱块双压法应用于穿刺拔鞘后局部创口的压迫止血时间明显缩短,止血效果好,对静脉回流受阻小,能降低拔鞘后的并发症,提高患者的舒适度,减轻病人的经济负担,能代替桡动脉介入穿刺部位止血器的应用,且能适应于各种穿刺创口的加压止血,能增加社会效益和经济效益。 Objective To explore the effect of compression hemostasis for local puncture point after percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary intervention .Methods One hundred patients who required coronary intervention in cardiovascular department were divided into control group and observation group ( n=50) according to they were in hospital in time sequence .In the control group , patients who accepted transradial coronary intervention were adopted arteries radials pneumatic tourniquet to hemostasis after pulling out sheath ;while the observation group were adopted band-aid joint gauze piece of dual pressure method to compression hemostasis.The hemostatic time , the condition of exudation , congestion and hematoma were observed in each group.Results Duration of compression hemostasis in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group .The incidence rate of exudation , congestion , hematoma and limbs swelling were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P〈0.01).Conclusions Band-aid joint gauze piece of dual pressure method is applied to local wound after pulling out sheath .The dual pressure method gives an effective hemostasis , can significantly reduce ligature time , avoids obstruction of venous reflux , and reduces the incidence of complications after pulling out sheath .It can take the place of disposable arteries radials pneumatic tourniquet , and suitable for all kinds of direct pressure of puncture wounds .The application of band-aid joint gauze piece of dual pressure method allows for improved the comfort of patients , lighten patients economic burden , increased the economic benefits and made societal benefits .
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2014年第18期2798-2800,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 冠心病介入 桡动脉 穿刺创口 创可贴纱块 双压止血 Percutaneous coronary intervention Radial artery Puncture wound Band-aid and gauze Dual compression hemostasis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献15

共引文献145

同被引文献60

  • 1翟屹,胡建平,孔灵芝,赵文华,陈春明.中国居民高血压造成冠心病和脑卒中的经济负担研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(9):744-747. 被引量:116
  • 2DOTTER C T,JUDKINS M P, FRISCHE L H, et al.Transluminal reeanalization for arterial obstruction in the legs In- dication and results based on a series of 175 treated casesFJ-~.Am J Cardio, 1968,21 (1):97.
  • 3GRUENTZIG A R,ROUBIN G S, CASARELLA W J.Percutaneous coronary angioplasty: technique indications and re- sults[J].Cardiovase Intervent Radiol, 1986,9 (5 - 6) : 261 - 272.
  • 4CROUSE S B,KITKO L A.Outeomes of coronary artery interventions comparing coronary artery bypass surgery and pereutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unprotected ].eft main stenosisl-J~.J Am Assoc Nurse Pratt,2014, 26(2) :91 - 101.
  • 5周卫萍,黄贤,王芳,等.不同术前宣教方式的效果评价[J].中国实用护理杂志,2010,26(supp11):72-73.
  • 6CAMPEAU L, HICKEY A, HERD J A.Safety of coronary arteriography in clinically stable patients following coronary bypass surgeryrJ].Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1998(4) 1376 - 381.
  • 7PINTARIC H.Why transradial instead of transfemoral approach for the percutaneous coronary interventionEJ3.Cardio- logia Croatica,2014,9(3) : 108.
  • 8ROMAGNOLI E,BIONDI- ZOCCAI G, SCIAHBASI A, et al.Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST- segment elevation acute coronary syndrome[-J3.J Am Coll Cardio, 2012,60(24) : 2 481 - 2 489.
  • 9JOLLY S S,YUSUF S,CAIRNS J, et al.Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in pa- tients with acute coronary syndromes(RIVAL) : a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial[J3.The Lancet, 2011, 377(9775)~1 409- 1 420.
  • 10HAMON M,PRISTIPINO C, MARIO C D,et al.Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardio- vascular interventions[J].EuroIntervention, 2013,8 (11) : 1 242 - 1 251.

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部