期刊文献+

不同林龄南方红豆杉人工林细根结构及C和N含量比较与相关性分析 被引量:5

Comparison on structure and C and N contents of fine root and their correlation analysis of Taxus chinensis var.mairei plantation with different stand ages
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对不同林龄南方红豆杉也Taxuschinensisvar.mairei(LemeeetLévl.)ChengetL.K.Fu页人工林不同等级细根的结构参数及C和N含量进行了比较,并分析了细根结构参数与C和N含量的相关性。结果显示:不同林龄南方红豆杉Ⅰ-吁级细根的根直径、比根长(SRL)和比表面积(SSA)均有差异,6、7和8a植株细根的平均直径分别为1.073、1.815和1.734mm,平均SRL分别为14.09、12.88和14.12m·g-1,平均SSA分别为54.93、45.85和50.72cm2·g-1;随根序等级提高,同龄植株细根的SRL和SSA均依次降低、根直径则逐渐增大,且总体差异显著(P〈0.05);总体上,除Ⅰ级细根外,7a植株各级细根的SRL和SSA均最小;6a植株各级细根的直径均最小。各林龄植株细根的根尖密度和分叉数无显著差异(P〉0.05),但均以6a植株最大。细根干质量以6a植株最低、7a植株最高,且差异显著。随根序等级提高,细根C含量逐渐增加、N含量则逐渐降低,同龄植株Ⅰ-Ⅴ级细根的C和N含量总体上差异显著;各级细根中,7a植株的C含量均最高、8a植株的N含量均最低;6、7和8a植株细根的平均C含量分别为454.41、501.90和441.55mg·g-1,平均N含量分别为12.63、11.99和5.88mg·g-1。各林龄植株细根的C含量与细根直径和干质量均正相关,与SRL、SSA和根尖密度均负相关;N含量与细根直径均负相关,与SRL、SSA和根尖密度均正相关;此外,N含量与干质量以及C和N含量与分叉数的相关性均无规律性。研究结果表明:树龄对南方红豆杉细根直径影响较大,而不同序级细根的结构差异更明显。 Structure parameters and C and N contents of different grade fine roots of Taxus chinensis var.mairei (Lemee et Lévl.) Cheng et L. K. Fu plantation with different stand ages were compared, and correlation between fine root structure parameters and its C and N contents was analyzed. Results show that there are differences in root diameter, specific root length (SRL) and specific surface area (SSA) ofⅠ- grades of fine roots of T. chinensis var. mairei with different stand ages, average root diameters of 6, 7 and 8 a plants are 1. 073, 1. 815 and 1. 734 mm, average SRL are 14. 09, 12. 88 and 14. 12 m·g-1 , and average SSA are 54. 93, 45. 85 and 50. 72 cm2 ·g-1 , respectively; with enhancing of root grade, gradually, SRL and SSA of fine root of same age plants decrease while root diameter increases with generally significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05); in general, except Ⅰ grade fine root, SRL and SSA of different grade fine roots of 7 a plant all are lower than those of 6 and 8 a plants; root diameter of different grade fine roots of 6 a plant are the smallest. There are no significant difference (P〉0. 05) in root-tip density and fork number among different age plants, but those of 6 a plant are the highest. Dry weight of fine root of 6 a plant is the lowest while that of 7 a plant is the highest with significant difference. With enhancing of root grade, C content in fine root increases gradually while N content decreases gradually. There are generally significant difference in C and N contents among Ⅰ-Ⅴgrade fine roots of the same age plant. In different grades of fine roots, C content in 7 a plant is the highest while N content in 8 a plant is the lowest; average C content of 6, 7 and 8 a plants is 454. 41, 501. 90 and 441. 55 mg·g-1 and average N content is 12. 63, 11. 99 and 5. 88 mg·g-1 , respectively. In fine root, C content has positive correlation with root diameter and dry weight and negative correlation with SRL, SSA and root-tip density; N content has negative correlation with root diameter and positive correlation with SRL, SSA and root-tip density; furthermore, there is no regular correlation in N content with dry weight, in C and N contents with fork number. It is suggested that tree age has a stronger influence on fine root diameter ofT. chinensis var. mairei, while it is more obvious in structure variation of fine root with different grades.
出处 《植物资源与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期8-14,共7页 Journal of Plant Resources and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30671664) 国家教育部博士学科专项基金项目(200803890010) 福建省科学技术厅重点项目(2011N0002)
关键词 南方红豆杉人工林 细根 结构 C和N含量 林龄 相关性 Taxus chinensis var. mairei plantation fine root structure C and N contents stand age correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1PREGITZER K S. Fine root of trees-a new perspective[ J]. NewPhytologist, 2002,154(2) : 267—270.
  • 2MAKITA N, HIRANO Yf MIZOGUCHI T, et al. Veiy fine rootsrespond to soil depth : biomass allocation, morphology, andphysiology in a broad-leaved temperate forest [ J ]. EcologicalResearch, 2011,26(1) : 95-104.
  • 3PREGITZER K S, KING J S, BURTON A J, et al. Responses oftree fine roots to temperature [ J ]. New Phytologist,2000,147 (1 ):105-115.
  • 4USMAN S, SINGH S P, RAWAT Y S, et al. Fine rootdecomposition and nitrogen mineralisation patterns in Quercusleucotrichophora and Pinus roxburghii forests in central Himalaya[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 131 : 191-199.
  • 5CALDWELL M M. Competition between root systems in naturalcommunities[ M] //GERGORY P J, LAKE J V,ROSE D A. RootDevelopment and Function. Cambridge ; Cambridge UniversityPress, 1987.
  • 6HENDRICK R L, PREGITZER K S. The dynamics of fine rootlength,biomass,and nitrogen content in two northern hardwoodecosystems [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1993 , 23(12) : 2507-2520.
  • 7王政权,郭大立.根系生态学[J].植物生态学报,2008,32(6):1213-1216. 被引量:103
  • 8TRUMBORE S E, GAUDINSKI J B. The secret lives of roots[ J].Science, 2003, 302: 1344-1345.
  • 9GUO D, LI H, MITCHELL R J, et al. Fine root heterogeneity bybranch order : exploring the discrepancy in root turnover estimatesbetween minirhizotron and carbon isotopic methods [ J ]. NewPhytologist,2008, 177(2) : 443-456.
  • 10PREG1TZER K S,DEFOREST J L,BURTON A J,et al. Fine rootarchitecture of nine North American trees [ J ]. EcologicalMonographs, 2002, 72(2) : 293-309.

二级参考文献274

共引文献914

同被引文献108

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部