期刊文献+

胃肠道大手术患者营养风险筛查及营养支持效果对比研究 被引量:7

Nutritional Risk Screening and Comparison The Effect of Nutritional Support Among The Patients with Gastroin-testinal Major Surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的以营养风险筛查工具2002(NRS 2002)调查双流县人民医院普通外科住院行胃肠道大手术患者的营养风险发生率,营养支持使用状况及其与临床结局之间的关系。方法采取定点抽样,选择2010年3月至2014年3月期间双流县第一人民医院普通外科住院行胃肠道大手术患者,用NRS 2002进行营养风险筛查,记录营养支持使用情况及相关临床结局指标,分析临床营养支持与患者临床结局之间的关系。本研究选择术后并发症及住院时间作为临床结局指标。结果共有130例患者符合研究纳入标准,其中112例完成了营养风险筛查。营养风险发生率为75.9%(85/112),营养支持率为50.9%(57/112),营养支持方式均为胃肠外营养。术后并发症发生率为46.4%(52/112);其中有营养风险且给予了营养支持的患者并发症发生率为41.7%(15/36),而在有营养风险但未进行营养支持的患者中并发症发生率高达73.5%(36/49),2组间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.002);在无营养风险的患者中,术后并发症发生率仅为3.7%(1/27)。结论 NRS 2002因其具备无创、简便的特点,适用于住院行胃肠道大手术的患者;胃肠道大手术患者因其疾病代谢的特殊性,具有较高的营养风险;对存在营养风险的胃肠道大手术患者进行合理的营养支持能够减少术后并发症发生的概率,改善患者的预后。 Objective To investigate the prevalence of the nutritional risks, the relationship between application of nutritional support and the clinical outcome of patients with gastrointestinal major surgery in the Frist People's Hospital of Shuangliu. Methods Gastrointestinal major surgery patients in Department of General Surgery in the Frist People's Hospital of Shuangliu from March 2010 to March 2014 were consecutively enrolled. Patients who provided informed consent were screened by NRS 2002, tracking nutrition support status and analysis the relationship between nutrition support and clinical outcome. In this study, the clinical outcome index included postoperative complications and hospitalization time. Results There were totally 130 cases enrolled, 112 cases completed assessment by NRS 2002.The prevalence of nutritional risk was 75.9%(85/112), there were totally 57 patients(50.9%) received nutrition support, and all for parenteral nutrition. The prevalence of postoperative complication was 46.4%(52/112). The prevalence of postoperative complication in patients who had nutritional risk and received nutritional support was 41.7%(15/36), whereas, in patients who had nutritional risk but not received nutritional support was 73.5%(36/49), there was statistically signifi cant difference between the 2 groups(P=0.002). In patients who not had nutritional risk, the postoperative complication rate was only 3.7%(1/27). Conclusions Because of noninvasive and easy to operate, NRS 2002 are adpted to hospitalized patients with gastrointestinal major surgery. Because of the specific of disease metabolism, the higher nutritional risk occurres in patients with gastrointestinal major surgery, appropriate nutritional support for this kinds of patients can reduce the incidence of postoperative complication, and improve the prognosis.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2014年第10期1259-1263,共5页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 胃肠道大手术 营养风险 营养支持 临床结局 Gastrointestinal major surgery Nutritional risk Nutritional support Clinical outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献132

共引文献718

同被引文献44

  • 1Qian-Lin Zhu,Bo Feng,Ai-Guo Lu,Ming-Liang Wang,Wei-Guo Hu,Jian-Wen Li,Zhi-Hai Mao,Min-Hua Zheng,Department of General Surgery,Shanghai Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200025,China,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center,Shanghai 200025,China.Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma:Complications and management in 132 consecutive patients[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(36):4605-4610. 被引量:24
  • 2中华医学会.临床诊疗指南一肠外肠内营养学分册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1-111.
  • 3Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is sub- jective global assessment of nutritional status [ J ]. JPEN, 1987 ( 1 ) :8 - 13.
  • 4Rubenstein LZ, Harker JO, Salva A, et al. Screening for undemutritiou in geriatric practice:Developing the Short- Form Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF)[ J]. J Get- ontol, 2001 (6) :366 -372.
  • 5Abdelgadir MA, Mahadi SE, Nasr AO, et al . Role of jeju- nostomy feeding catheter as a model for nutritional support [J]. Int J Surg, 2010(6) :439 -443.
  • 6Bruce RS,Blackburn GL,Joseph Vitale,et al.Prevalence of malnutrition in general medical patients[J].JAMA,1976,235(4):1567-1570.
  • 7Edington J,Boorman J,Durrant ER,et a1.Prevalence of malnutrition on admission to four hospitals in England[J].Clin Nutr,2000,l9(3):l91-195.
  • 8Kondrup J,Allison SP,Elia M,et al,Educational and Clinical Practice Committee,European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition(ESPEN).ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002[J].Clin Nutr,2003,22(4):415-421.
  • 9Kyle UG,Kossovsky MP,Karsegard VL,et al.Comparison of tools for nutritional assessment and screening at hosp ital admission:a population study[J].J Clin Nutr,2006,25(3):409-417.
  • 10Lochs H,Allison SP,Meier R,et all,Introductory to the ESPEN guiderlines in enteral nutrition:terminology,definitions and general topics[J].J Clin Nutr,2006,25(2):180-186.

引证文献7

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部