期刊文献+

辅助生殖技术助孕移植胚胎发育时期与异位妊娠的关系初探 被引量:5

Analysis of the Relevance between Embryo Development and Ectopic Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproduction Technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨辅助生殖技术(ART)助孕中移植胚胎发育时期与异位妊娠的关系。方法:对2009年11月至2013年2月我院接受ART助孕并获得临床妊娠的6627个周期,胚胎移植的时间为取卵后48小时(D2)、72小时(D3)或120小时/148小时(D5/D6),依据移植时胚胎发育时期将数据分为D2组、D3组和D5/D6组,回顾性分析3组临床资料。结果:3组不孕的输卵管因素比率及有异位妊娠史比率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。D2组、D3组和D5/D6组异位妊娠总发生率分别为2.6%(7/272)、3.3%(196/5988)和3.0%(11/367),除外冻融移植周期后,新鲜移植周期D2组、D3组和D5/D6组异位妊娠发生率分别为2.7%(7/260)、2.9%(115/3949)和2.8%(7/255),差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:异位妊娠发生率与移植胚胎发育时期没有关系。 Objective:To examine the relevance between the embryo development in assisted reproductive technology(ART) cycles and ectopic pregnancy. Methods: To retrospectively analyze the clinical and laboratory data of 3382 fresh IVF-ET cycles,1082 fresh ICSI-ET cycles and 2163 frozen-thawed-ET cycles which resulted in clinical pregnancy from Nov 2009 to Feb 2013 in the first affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou university. According to the development stage when the embryos were transferred,the cycles were divided into three groups. D2 group, D3 group,and D5/6 group. Results:The ectopic pregnancy rate in Day 2, Day 3, and Day 5/6 group was 2.6% (7/272) ,3.3% ( 196/5988 ), and 3.0% ( 11/367 ), respectively, and there was no significant difference among groups( P 〉0.05). For only fresh transfers,the ectopic pregnancy rate in Day 2, Day 3, and Day 5/6 group was 2.7% (7/260) ,2.9% ( 115/3949 ), and 2.8% (7/255), respectively, and there was no significant difference among groups( P 〉 0.05). Conclusions: The embryo development stage in assisted reproductive technology cycles has no significant correlation with ectopic pregnancy.
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期784-787,共4页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 异位妊娠 辅助生殖技术 胚胎发育时期 Ectopic pregnancy Assisted reproductive techniques Embryo development stage
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Juneau C,Bates GW.Reproductive outcomes after medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy[J] .Clin Obstet Gynecol,2012,55 (2):455-460.
  • 2Schippert C,Soergel P,Staboulidou I,et al.The risk of ectopic pregnancy following tubal reconstructive microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology procedures[J] .Arch Gynecol Obstet,2012,285(3):863-871.
  • 3Thomas MR,Sparks AE,Ryan GL,et al.Clinical predictors of human blastocyst formation and pregnancy after extended embryo culture and transfer[J] .Fertil Steril,2009,94 (2):543-548.
  • 4Cavagna M,Maldonado LG,de Souza Bonetti TC,et al.Supplementation with a recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin microdose leads to similar outcomes in ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone using either a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist for pituitary suppression[J] .Fertil Steril,2010,94(1):167-172.
  • 5郝桂琴,李蓉,耿岚,许锦贝,杨伟洪.胚胎移植与囊胚移植的临床结局分析[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(31):5739-5742. 被引量:17
  • 6Fanchin R,Ayoubi JM,Righini C,et al.Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers[J] .Hum Reprod,2001,16 (6):1115-1119.
  • 7Milki A A,Jun SH.Ectopic pregnancy rates with day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer:a retrospective analysis[J] .BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2003,3(1):7.
  • 8Bouyer J,Coste J,Shojaei T,et al.Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy:a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control,population-based study in France[J] .Am J Epidemiol,2003,157 (3):185-194.
  • 9Lund KL,Egerup P,Wessel SC,et al.Long-term reproductive outcomes in women whose first pregnancy is ectopic:a national controlled follow-up study[J] .Hum Reprod,2013,28(1):241-246.
  • 10Chang HJ,Suh CS.Ectopic pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology:what are the risk factors[J] .Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2010,22(3):202-207.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Brinsden PRA textbook of in vitro fertilization and assisted reproduction.New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group Inc. 1999:196.
  • 2Gardner DK, Schootcraft WB.In vitro culture of human blastocyst. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D.Towards reproductive certainty (infertility and genetics beyond 1999). Carnforth: Parthenon Press.1999: 378-388.
  • 3Blake DA, Farquhar CM, Johnson N,et al. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rew 2007;(4):CD002118.
  • 4Guerif F, Lemseffer M,Bidault R,et aI.Single day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Hum Reprod.2009;24:1051-1058.
  • 5Guerif F, Lemseffer M,Bidault R,et al.Single day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Hum Reprod.2009;24(5): 1051-1058.
  • 6Sills ES,Moomjy M,Zaninovic N,et al.Human zona pellucida micromanipulation and monozygotic twinning frequency after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:890-895.
  • 7Abusheikha N,Salha O,Sharma V, et al.Monozygotic twinning and IVF/ICSI treatment: a report of 11 cases and review of literature. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6:396-403.
  • 8Chang HJ,Lee JR,Jee BC,et al.Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91 (6): 2381-2390.
  • 9Papanikolaou EG, Fatemi H,Venetis C,et al.Monozygotic twinning is not increased after single blastocyst transfer compared with single cleavage-stage embryo transfer.Fertil Steril.2010;93(2): 592-597.
  • 10Bengt K, Orvar F, Anna L, et al. Blastocyst versus cleavage stage transfer in in vitro fertilization: differences in neonatal outcome? Fertil Steril. 2010;94(5): 1680-1683.

共引文献16

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部