摘要
逻辑在法律实践中始终在场且作用重大。传统法理论的狭义逻辑观以及实践论导向之缺失,使得逻辑在法律实践中处于边缘地位。在法律实践论语境下,逻辑形式与其所涉内容之二分具有相对性,这决定了法律逻辑可依照形式和非形式两维度发展。作为一种关涉正义实践的逻辑框架,沃尔顿的新论辩术实现了论辩理性与程序理性的转向,在后现代语境下具有独特的理论意蕴。就逻辑的本质而言,实践论解释可为法律逻辑提供合法性根据。
Logic is always present in the legal practice and its effect is significant. Lack of practical guidance in the traditional legal theory, the status of logic in legal practice is fringe. In the context of legal practice theory, the binary of logical form and content is relative, which determines the legal logic development being in accordance with two dimensions. As a matter of justice practice logic framework, Walton's new argument technique realizes the steering of argumentation rationality and procedure rationality, which has a unique theoretical significance in postmodern context. In terms of logic in the nature, praxis can provide legitimate basis for legal logic.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2014年第5期35-45,157,共11页
Journal Of CUPL
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目--"全面推进依法治国的逻辑理性根基研究"(项目编号:13AXZ0017)的阶段性研究成果