摘要
目的:探讨树脂加强型玻璃离子粘合剂对牙齿粘结效果及美容满意度的影响,以寻求粘结效果较好且可以实现微创美容牙科治疗(MiCD)的牙科充填材料.方法:以2010年6月- 2013年1 0月于我院口腔科就诊的142例行正畸治疗的患者为研究对象,并将其随机分为观察组(71例)和对照组(71例),对照组71例患者采用京津釉质粘结剂进行托槽粘结,观察组71例患者采用树脂加强型玻璃离子粘合剂进行托槽粘结.观察并比较两组患者使用粘结剂后的粘结强度、ARI(粘结剂残留指数)评分以及患者对使用不同粘结剂的满意度.结果:两种粘合剂在不同时间的粘结强度比较无显著性差异,但观察组患者ARI评分为0的比例高于对照组患者,且观察组患者满意度显著高于对照组(χ^2=14.994,P<0.05).结论:采用树脂加强型玻璃离子粘合剂对牙齿进行粘结时粘结强度高,粘合剂残留少,更符合患者对牙齿美容的需求,值得进一步探究及推广使用.
Objective To study the resin reinforced glass ion adhesive bonding effect and beauty satisfaction on teeth, to find a solution to the binding effect is good and can implement minimally invasive cosmetic dental treatment (MiCD) of dental filling material. Methods In June 2010 to October 2013 in our hospital dental clinic as the research object, 142 patients who underwent the orthodontic treatment and randomly divided into observation group (71 cases) and control group (71 cases) and control group, 71 cases of patients with braces cohere with the beijing-tianjin enamel bonding agent, and observation group 71 cases were treated by orthodontic bracket bonding resin reinforced glass ion cement. To observe and compare the two groups of patients after using adhesive bonding strength, ARI (adhesive residue index) score and the use of different binder beauty satisfaction. Results The two kinds of adhesive bond strength is at a different time there was no significant difference,but the observation group of patients with ARI score of 0 is higher than the control group patients,the proportion of the beauty and the observation group patients satisfaction is significantly higher than the control group (chi-square = 14.994,P〈0.05). Conclusion The resin reinforced glass ion adhesive bonding of teeth when high bond strength, adhesive residue, less more accord with the demand for dental patients, deserves further exploration and promotion use.
出处
《中国美容医学》
CAS
2014年第18期1558-1560,共3页
Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine