期刊文献+

大学生压力后成长问卷的编制 被引量:13

Development of the Undergraduates' Post-Stress Growth Questionnaire
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索中国文化背景下大学生压力后成长的结构维度,编制大学生压力后成长量表,并检验其效度和信度。方法:通过文献分析、开放式问卷调查(n=120)和访谈(n=15)编制题项,形成初测问卷。选取456名预测样本进行探索性因子分析,选取570名正式施测样本进行项目分析、验证性因子分析、效标关联效度检验和内部一致性信度检验;从正式施测样本中抽取147人间隔2周后重测。以复原力量表(RQ)为效标工具。结果:探索性因子分析表明,问卷的结构维度包括人际关系、生活观念、应对技能、自我认知4个因子,能解释总方差的48.84%;验证性因子分析表明4个因子与构想模型拟合较好(x^2/,if:2.38,CFI=0.97,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.92,NFI=0.95,RMSEA=0.05);问卷得分与RQ得分呈正相关(r=0.43,P〈0.01)。总问卷的Cronbachd系数是0.87,4个因子的a系数在0.64~0.79之间;总问卷的重测信度为0.80,4个因子的相关系数在0.68~0.84之间。结论:本研究编制的大学生压力后成长问卷具有良好的效度和信度,可作为测量大学生压力后成长的有效工具。 Objective: To explore the contained dimensions of undergraduates′ post-stress growth based on Chinese actual conditions and to develop the Undergraduate's Post-Stress Growth Questionnaire (UPSGQ). Methods: According to literature analysis, open-label questionnaire investigation ( n = 120) ) and interview ( n = 15), the preliminary questionnaire of undergraduates'post-stress growth was designed. After two sampling tests, the first pre- dicted sample (n = 456) was conducted with item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and the formal tested sample (n = 570) was conducted with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Another sample of 147 undergraduates was tested and retested two weeks later. The Resiliency Questionnaire (RQ) were used to test its criterion validity. Results: EFA showed that the scale contained 4 dimensions, including inter-personal relationship, life view, coping skills and self-concept. It explained the 48. 84% of total variance. CFA showed that the 4 dimensions fitted well with structural model (x^2/df= 2. 38, CFI = 0. 97, GFI = 0. 94, AGFI =0. 92, NFI = 0. 95, and RMSEA = 0. 05). The UPSGQ scores were positively correlated with the RQ scores (r =0. 43, P 〈0.01). The Cronbach's α coefficients were 0. 87 for the total scale and 0. 64 -0. 79 for the 4 dimensions. The test-retest reliabilities were 0. 80 for the total scale and 0. 68 - 0. 84 for the 4 dimensions. Conclusion: The Undergraduate′ s Post-Stress Growth Questionnaire (UPSGQ) has good validity and reliability, and could be applied to measure the undergraduates'post-stress growth.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期772-777,共6页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 广西教育科学十一五规划课题(2010C020) 广西哲学社会科学规划课题(13BSH001)
关键词 大学生 压力后成长问卷 效度 信度 心理测量学 undergraduates Post-Stress Growth Questionnaire validity reliability psychometrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG. Positive aspects of critical life prob- lems: recollections of grief [ J]. Omega, 1989, 20:265 - 272.
  • 2Collins RE, Taylor SE, Skokan LA. A better world or a shattered vision'? Changes in life perspectivcs following victimization [J]. Soc Cogn, 1990, 8:263 -285.
  • 3Wallerstein JS. Women after divorce: preliminary report from a ten- year follow up [ J]. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 1986, 56 (1) : 65 - 77.
  • 4Peterson C, Park N, Pole N, et al. Strengths of character and postt- raumatic growth [ J]. J Traumat Stress, 2008, 21 (2) : 214 - 217.
  • 5Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foun- dations and empirical evidence [ J]. Psychol Inquiry, 2004, 15 (1): 1 -18.
  • 6涂阳军,郭永玉.创伤后成长:概念、影响因素、与心理健康的关系[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(1):114-122. 被引量:90
  • 7张金凤,史占彪,赵品良,王力.汶川震后初中生创伤后成长状况及相关因素[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(5):357-362. 被引量:22
  • 8Joseph S, Inley PA, Shevlin M, et al. Assessing positive and nega- tive changes in the aftermath of adversity: a short form of the chan- ges in outlook questionnaire [J]. Psychol Assess, 2005, 17( 1 ) : 70 - 80.
  • 9史光远,崔丽霞,雷雳,郑日昌.大学生的压力、情绪与心理弹性[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2013,27(9):703-708. 被引量:58
  • 10王晓刚.大学生心理危机状况分析与对策研究[J].吉林省教育学院学报,2008,24(3):25-27. 被引量:8

二级参考文献204

共引文献252

同被引文献193

引证文献13

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部