期刊文献+

大学生道德推脱问卷的编制

The Establishment of the Questionnaire of Moral Disengagement for College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文旨在编制适合我国国情的大学生道德推脱问卷,便于道德推脱的本土化研究。具体方法是运用文献综述、开放式问卷调查法,结合班杜拉(Bandura,1986)编制的道德推脱量表,形成初测问卷,对250名大学生进行第一次施测,通过进一步修改,再对260名大学生进行第二次施测。结果表明因素分析发现该问卷包括四个维度,即道德辩护、有利比较、责备归因、责任推脱,总量表的Cronbach系数为0.901,各个维度的内部一致性系数在0.605至0.862之间。最后得出结论:量表具有较好的信度效度,可作为进一步研究的测量工具。 Purpose : Establishing the questionnaire of Moral Disengagement for college students in our national conditions in order to do the local research of Moral Disengagement. Methods:By the literature review and open-ended question- naire, combined with the questionnaire of Moral Disengagement (Bandura, 1986) , formulating the initial questionnaire for the first survey of 250 college students, and the second survey of 260 college students through the further modifica- tion. Results : By the factor analysis, we find that The questionnaire of Moral Disengagement includes four elements : moral iustification, advantageous comparison, attribution of blame and disengagement of responsibility. The Cronbach Coeffi- cient of total scale is 0. 901, while the internal consistency coefficient of branch scale is between 0. 605 and 0. 862. Conclusion: It has good reliability and validity, and can be a measurement tool for the further resenrch
作者 卢永兰
机构地区 龙岩学院
出处 《湖北第二师范学院学报》 2014年第8期107-109,共3页 Journal of Hubei University of Education
关键词 大学生 道德推脱 信度 效度 college students moral disengagement reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1黄任之,姚树桥,邹涛.个人主义和集体主义量表中文版信度和效度的研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(6):564-565. 被引量:16
  • 2Detert JR,Trevino LK, Sweitzer VL. Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008,93(2) : 374-391.
  • 3Aquino K,Reed II A,Thau S,Freeman D. A grotesque and dark beauty:How moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2007,43 (3) : 385-392.
  • 4Eisenberg N. Emotion,regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 2000,51 : 665-697.
  • 5Baker VL,Deter JR,Trevifio LK. Moral disengagement in business school students:Predictors and comparisons. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper,2006, SIM : H1-H6.
  • 6Duffy MK,Aquino K,Tepper BJ,Reed A,O'Leary-Delly AM. Moral disengagement and social identification': When does being similar result in harm doing? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Honolulu, HI, 2005.
  • 7Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara GV,Pastorelli C. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71 (2): 364-374.
  • 8Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall, 1986.
  • 9Moore C. Moral disengagement in processes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008,80(1) : 129-139.
  • 10Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1999,3(3) : 193-209.

共引文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部