期刊文献+

2种血细胞分析仪的实验室内比对结果分析 被引量:5

Analysis of in-laboratory comparative results between two kinds of hematology analyzer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析XT-1800i与XS-1000i血细胞分析仪检测结果的一致性和可比性。方法按照美国临床实验室标准化委员会(NCCLS)的EP9-A2文件,以XT-1800i血细胞分析仪为比对仪器,与XS-1000i血细胞分析仪进行比对和结果分析。结果 XT-1800i与XS-1000i的白细胞(WBC)、红细胞(RBC)、血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞比容(HCT)、平均红细胞体积(MCV)和血小板(PLT)的相关系数r≥0.975,医学决定水平处的系统误差均<1/2规定的允许总误差,中性粒细胞百分数(NEUT)、淋巴细胞百分数(LYMPH)、单核细胞百分数(MONO)、嗜酸性粒细胞百分数(EO)相关系数r≥0.975,但是嗜碱性粒细胞百分数(BASO)不具有相关性。结论 XT-1800i和XS-1000i血细胞分析仪WBC、RBC、Hb、HCT、MCV和PLT检测结果基本一致,可为临床提供准确一致的检验结果,但是对于白细胞分类结果,应重视其比对。 Objective Analysis of the consistency and comparability of test results of XT- 1800 i and XS- 1000 i hematology analyzer. Methods According to the U. S. Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards( NCCLS) of EP9- A2 document,we compared XT- 1800 i hematology analyzer with the XS- 1000 i hematology analyzer for comparison and analysis of results. Results The correlation coefficient of WBC,RBC,Hb,HCT,MCV and PLT were≥0. 975,the system error in medical decision level was less than 1 /2 of the allowable total error. The correlation coefficient of NEUT,LYMPH,MONO,EO were ≥ 0. 975,but BASO was not relevant. Conclusion WBC,RBC,Hb,HCT,MCV and PLT detection results of XT- 1800 i and XS-1000 i hematology analyzer are basically consistent,can provide clinically accurate and consistent test results,but for the classification of leukocytes,we shall increase attention to the comparability.
机构地区 山东省胸科医院
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 北大核心 2014年第19期2818-2820,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献44

  • 1张秀明,庄俊华,徐宁,黄宪章,陈茶,尹一兵,梁伟雄.不同检测系统血清酶测定结果的偏倚评估与可比性研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2006,29(4):346-349. 被引量:137
  • 2从玉隆,冯仁丰,陈晓东.临床实验室管理学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2004:194.
  • 3National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. EPg-A2:Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline-second edition[S]. Wayne, PA : NCCI.S, 2002.
  • 4England JM, Rowan RM, Van Assendemft OW, et al. Pro- tocol for evaluation of automated blood cell counters[J]. Clin Lab Haematol,1984,6(1):69 84.
  • 5David Burnett. ISO 15189:2003-Quality management, e valuation and continual improvement[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med,2006,44(6) :733-739.
  • 6Novis DA,Walsh M,Wilkinson D,et al.Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review:a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of95141complete blood count determinations performed in263institutions[J].Arch Pathol Lab Med,2006,130(5):596-601.
  • 7National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.EP9-A2,Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples,Approved Guideline-Second Edition[S].Wayne PA:NCCLS,2002.
  • 8Pullianen J T, Grandell J, Hallikainen M T. Retrieval of surface temperature in Boreal Forest Zone from SSM/I data[J]. IEEE Trans on Geosci and Remote Sensing, 1997, 35: 1188-1200.
  • 9Ulaby F T, Moore R K, Fung A K. Microwave Remote Sensing: Active and Passive[M]. Weiley:Addison-Weiley Publishing Company, 1981.
  • 10周微雅,周达利,黄作群,黄钧,赖国健,王勇,覃乃辉.不同血细胞分析仪比对试验在质量控制中的应用[J].广西医学,2007,29(11):1740-1742. 被引量:14

共引文献47

同被引文献30

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部