论立案调解程序的附加功能与规制——以立案调解对审判效率的影响为视角

Research on Additive Role and Regulation of Prompt Mediation Program after Acceptance——From the Perspective of Mediation's Influence on Judicial Efficiency

立案调解,作为近几年新出现的一种法院处理纠纷的方式,在全国各地、各级法院的审判实务中都取得了非常好的效果。它不仅有效地把很多争议解决在了审判程序之外,降低了法院的收案数量,有效缓解了法院"案多人少"的矛盾,而且对于缓解当事人之间的激烈对抗起着至关重要的作用,有利于真正做到"息诉服判"、"案结事了"。然而,随着立案调解实践的发展,它的一个附加作用也逐渐显现出来,即立案调解可以促进审判效率的提高。通过某法庭在实行立案调解程序前后各项统计数据的对比分析,从实证角度可揭示出立案调解对审判效率的影响;立案调解能够促进审判效率提高的原因在于立案调解的四个附加功能的角度,即诉前送达程序、繁简分流功能、心理疏导功能、庭前准备功能。在立法中应对立案调解进行必要的确认和规制,以保证其运行的合法性,更好地发挥其功效,促进审判效率的进一步提高。

In recent years, case mediation, as a new way to deal with disputes in court, has achieved very good results in practice.It not only effectively puts a lot of dispute resolution out of the trial procedure, reduce the number of the court cases, effectively relieves the pressure the court, and plays an important role in alleviating the fierce confrontation between the parties. However, with the development of mediation practice, it＇s an additive role also gradually revealed, namely the case mediation can improve the efficiency of the trial.Therefore, in order to ensure the legitimacy of its operation, better play its effect, and promote the further improve the trial efficiency,it is essential to give it necessary confirmation and regulation.