期刊文献+

“从契约到身份”——以船员劳务合同的特殊性及司法应对为视角 被引量:7

“From contract to status”——from the perspective of specificity in seafarer service contract and judicial response
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对《中华人民共和国劳动合同法》《中华人民共和国船员条例》颁布后船员劳务合同纠纷案件中出现的新情况和面临的新问题,在分析当前相关立法、船员劳务关系现状以及一字之差的"劳务"与"劳动"合同对保护船员权益存在本质不同的基础上,认为船员不仅应当得到"契约"的保护,还应当基于劳动者"身份"得到劳动法的特殊保护。进而,针对船员劳务合同相比一般劳动合同的特殊性,从合同关系、主体、内容、责任和纠纷解决机制等方面提出司法如何予以应对的相应观点。 As witnessed by the judicial practice, new issues and problems in regards to disputes of seafarer service contract a- rise since the promulgation of Labor Contract Law and Seafarer Rule. It is opinioned that a seafarer shall not only be protected by the "contract" as one contracting party, he may also be entitled to rights to the fullest extent in his capacity as seafarer under labor law. The aforesaid conclusion is reached by analyzing current legislation and seafarer service relationship, also clarification is made on distinction in nature in protecting seafarers' rights under labor contract and service contract, as the change of one word would make a great deal of difference. Furthermore, in consideration of the specific characteristics of sea- farer service contract other than general labor contract, some proposals are made on how to cope with the aforesaid problems in view of contractual relationship, entity, contents, liabilities and disputes resolutions of seafarer service contract.
作者 汪洋
机构地区 上海海事法院
出处 《中国海商法研究》 CSSCI 2014年第3期29-35,83,共8页 Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
关键词 船员劳务合同 劳动合同 司法应对 seafarer service contract labor contract judicial response.
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献15

  • 1董保华.劳务派遣的法学思考[J].中国劳动,2005(6):10-13. 被引量:101
  • 2张德生,张可心.论船员劳务合同下人身伤亡索赔纠纷[EB/OL].(2005-11-11).http://www.ccmt.org.cn.
  • 3王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究(1)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997.
  • 4[1947]1,61.It was further said,at 13-14,that the question which of the two employers would be liable for the tort of the borrowed servant was not determined by any agreement between them.
  • 5J.N.Adams and R.Brownsword,' Double Indemnity-Contractual Indemnity Clauses Revisited'[1988] JBL146,149.
  • 6Bhoomidas v.Port of Singapore Authority[1978]I All ER956,960.
  • 7Strait v.Hale Constr.Co.,26 Cal.Ap.3d941,103Cal.Rptr.487(1972) and for further references to US views,seeJ.A.Henderson and R.N.Pearson,The Torts Process(1981),177-9; and for an analysis of the parallel problem I UK labour law,see S.Deakin,'The Changing Concept of the "Employer" in Labour Law' (2001)30 Industrial LJ72.转引自 Simon Deakin、Angus Johnston、Basil Markesinis:TORT LAW,oxford University Press2003 Fifth edition,page580.
  • 8Atiyah,p 150.《美国代理法诠释》Restatement of Agency,2d Vol 1,p.499.
  • 9王利明主持的中国人民大学.《民法典》草案建议稿第1889条.
  • 10Simon Deakin、Angus Johnston、Basil Markesinis:TORT LAW,Oxford University Press2003 Fifth edition,page580.

共引文献53

同被引文献71

引证文献7

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部